Nuclear Sub leaked radioactive water for months

August 1, 2008

CNN: Nuclear sub leaked radioactive water in Pacific for months

From Jamie McIntyre and Mike Mount
CNN Pentagon Unit

WASHINGTON (CNN) — Water with trace amounts of radioactivity may have leaked for months from a U.S. Navy nuclear-powered submarine as it traveled around the Pacific to ports in Guam, Japan and Hawaii,Navy officials told CNN on Friday.

The USS Houston arrives in Pearl Harbor for routine maintenance, during which the leak was found.

The USS Houston arrives in Pearl Harbor for routine maintenance, during which the leak was found.

The leak was found on the USS Houston, a Los Angeles-class fast attack submarine, after it went to Hawaii for routine maintenance last month, Navy officials said.

Navy officials said the amount of radiation leaked into the water was virtually undetectable. But the Navy alerted the Japanese government because the submarine had been docked in Japan.

The problem was discovered last month when a build-up of leaking water popped a covered valve and poured onto a sailor’s leg while the submarine was in dry dock.

An investigation found a valve was slowly dripping water from the sub’s nuclear power plant. The water had not been in direct contact with the nuclear reactor, Navy officials said.

Officials with knowledge of the incident could not quantify the amount of radiation leaked but insisted it was “negligible” and an “extremely low level.” The total amount leaked while the sub was in port in Guam, Japan and Hawaii was less than a half of a microcurie (0.0000005 curies), or less than what is found in a 50-pound bag of lawn and garden fertilizer, the officials said.

The sailor who was doused, a Houston crew member, tested negative for radiation from the water, according to Navy officials.

Since March, the Houston had crisscrossed the western Pacific, spending a week in Japan and several weeks in both Guam and Hawaii, Navy officials said.

The Navy on Friday notified the Japanese government of the leak, the officials said, and told them it was possible the ship had been leaking while in port in Sasebo, Japan, in March.

While Japan has agreed to allow U.S. nuclear-powered ships in Japanese ports, the decision was a not popular in Japan.

The Houston incident comes at a time when the Navy is trying to smooth over a problem with a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier.

The USS George Washington was due to replace the aging, conventionally powered USS Kitty Hawk this summer as the United States’ sole carrier based in Japan.

While en route to Japan this May, a massive fire broke out on the George Washington, causing $70 million in damage. The fire was blamed on crew members smoking near improperly stored flammable materials.

There was no damage or threat to the nuclear reactor, but the ship was diverted to San Diego, California, for repairs. It now is expected to arrive in Japan at the end of September.

The Navy this week fired the captain and his deputy, saying an investigation into the fire led to a lack of confidence in the leadership of both men.

Just two weeks ago, thousands of Japanese protested the pending arrival of the George Washington.

B-52 crash is the fourth incident in the past year

A B-52 strategic bomber crashed in Guam. Here’s an excerpt from an AP article:

A US air force B-52 bomber has crashed off the island of Guam in the Pacific Ocean, the US coastguard has said.

The aircraft carrying six crew members went down while on its way to conduct a flyover in a parade to mark Monday’s anniversary of Guam’s 1944 liberation from Japanese occupation in the second world war.

Below is an article from KUAM news.

Today’s B-52 crash is fourth military aircraft incident in past year

by Ronna Sweeney, KUAM News
Monday, July 21, 2008

This latest incident, that remains under investigation, is the 4th accident involving a military aircraft that occurred on Guam over the past year. Back in March, a B-1b Lancer strategic bomber rolled independently at the Yigo base colliding with a group of emergency response vehicles. There were no injuries or fatalities as a result of the accident.

On February 23, the billion dollar B-2 Spirit stealth bomber crashed just after takeoff from Andersen Air Force Base making global headlines. Both pilots ejected from the aircraft prior to the crash that occurred on the Yigo base’s runway.

In June, an Accident Investigation Board revealed its findings into the crash and stated that a computer miscalculation was to blame for the incident.

On February 12, a Navy Ea-6b Prowler attached to the U.S.S. Kittyhawk strike group went down about 20 miles to the Northeast of AAFB. According to news files, the four-crew members on board were able to eject before the aircraft crashed in the water.

Copyright © 2000-2008 by Pacific Telestations, Inc.
=

Foreign Occupations

Here’s an article from Foreign Policy in Focus with many links to other articles covering different aspects of the U.S. Empire including military bases and missile defenses, economic crises and interventions in the affairs of other countries.

Source: www.fpif.org

World Beat
by JOHN FEFFER | Monday, February 25, 2008
Vol. 3, No. 8

Foreign Occupation

Imagine a foreign military base in the United States.

The European Union has developed an independent army. It maintains a strategic interest in its former colonies in the Caribbean. The dollar is weak, and the euro is strong. In exchange for canceling some of the U.S. debt owed to European countries, the EU says, “Hey, how about a spot of land on your southern coast where we can help ensure the security of the region?” The United States gives a Henny Youngman response: “Take Miami. Please.”

The U.S. public is concerned. Foreign soldiers on U.S. soil? That hasn’t happened since 1812, when the Brits burned down the White House. The U.S. government, desperate for a little debt relief, reassures the population: “They’re allies. You don’t have to worry about them. There’s been a spike of terrorist activity down there in the islands, and our European friends will be helping us defend you against the bad guys.” So the Europeans buy some cheap real estate in
downtown Miami and set up shop.

The problems with this little debt-for-bases swap emerge rather quickly. Our “allies” begin behaving badly. First it’s just a couple fistfights with the locals. Then one of the EU soldiers is accused of raping a young woman. Shortly after that, an EU armored personnel carrier, on a narrow road at dusk, strikes and kills a University of Miami sophomore on his bike. The controversy over these crimes escalates when, as per the status of forces agreement, the Miami authorities hand over the suspects to the EU, which is concerned about the rather barbaric U.S. habit of executing people whether they’re guilty or innocent. Meanwhile, Miami civic groups begin accusing the EU military officials of burying toxic chemicals on base property and releasing noxious fumes into the atmosphere. People living near the compound complain about the noise from the artillery range. Then there’s the grower whose entire crop of oranges is destroyed when an EU jet fighter drops a bomb that completely misses the testing ground.

Sound implausible? That kind of stuff couldn’t happen between allies. Except that it does. And you could get a bushel of similar stories from the people of South Korea, Okinawa, the Philippines, Diego Garcia, Guam, Cuba, Djibouti, and all the other places where the United States maintains one of its 700-plus military bases around the world. Until recently, South Korea hosted a huge military base in downtown Seoul. Over the course of its military presence on the Japanese island of Okinawa, U.S. service personnel have attacked, kidnapped, abused, gang-raped or murdered over 400 women (just this month a staff sergeant was arrested and charged with raping a 14-year-old girl in Okinawa). Back in the 1990s, the U.S. Army estimated that it would cost $3 billion to clean up just the soil and groundwater pollution that the bases have caused abroad. And the United States has argued that these bases are necessary to protect not only U.S. interests but also the local people.

This week at FPIF, we debut our new strategic focus on the global U.S. military footprint – and how to shrink it. We start with Iraq, where the footprint is off the charts. As FPIF contributor Tom Engelhardt of TomDispatch.com explains in The Million Year War, the Bush administration has put down roots in the country. “This administration has already built its state-of-the-art mega-bases in Iraq as well as a mega-embassy, the largest on the planet,”
Engelhardt writes. “Yet in April 2003, the month Baghdad fell to American forces, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld first denied that the United States was seeking ‘permanent’ bases in Iraq. Ever since then, administration officials have consistently denied that those increasingly permanent-looking mega-bases were ‘permanent.'” The Bush administration is temporary but alas, the Iraq bases are looking very suspiciously permanent.

FPIF contributor Adil Shamoo provides two explanations for Bush’s strategy of an “enduring presence” in Iraq. “One is to intimidate future Iraqi governments from daring to break the relationship with the only superpower that can threaten their very existence,” he writes in The Enduring Trap in Iraq. “The second is to intimidate anyone who wins the U.S. presidential election with the accusation of ‘cutting and running’ in Iraq.”

In some parts of the world, the United States is reducing, retrenching, repositioning. But not Africa. With the new Africa Command – AFRICOM – the United States is aiming for full continental dominance. “The Pentagon claims that AFRICOM is all about integrating coordination and ‘building partner capacity,'” write FPIF contributors Daniel Volman and Beth Tuckey in Militarizing Africa (Again). “But the new structure is really about securing oil resources, countering terrorism, and rolling back Chinese influence. Given AFRICOM’s emphasis on defense over diplomacy, resistance to the initiative is possible not only from civic movements but even the U.S. State Department.”

The expansion of U.S. basing extends to Europe as well. The United States has been twisting arms in the “new” Europe – in Rummyspeak – to install 10 interceptor missiles in Poland and a radar military base in the Czech Republic. But according to FPIF contributors Joanne Landy and Thomas Harrison, it’s far from a done deal. Sixty percent of Poles and 70% of Czechs are opposed to the bases. “Resistance in Europe and elsewhere has received reinforcement from the U.S. Congress, which has hesitated to move forward with the bases,” they write in Pushing Missile Defense in Europe. “In May 2007, the Senate Armed Services Committee cut $85 million from the 2008 Defense Authorization act intended for site activation and construction work on the missile installation in Poland and radar site in the Czech Republic. The Senate committee action followed a House vote earlier in May to cut the president’s request for the anti-missile system by $160 million.”

This Wednesday, February 27, if you’re in the Washington, DC area, please join us for a protest we’re cosponsoring with the Campaign for Peace and Democracy against the proposed U.S. base in the Czech Republic. We’ll be meeting at 12:30 in front of the White House, just across from Lafayette Park. Bring your lunch, your signs, and your friends.

Welcome President Bush!

FPIF continued its coverage of President George W. Bush’s visit to Africa last week. In his sardonic contribution Welcome President Bush!, FPIF contributor Tajudeen Abdulraheem explains the difficulties of rolling out the red carpet. “The hassles of hosting a U.S. president are bad enough,” he writes. “His people take over your whole country and make our normally inefficient states go into overdrive and our egregious first ladies and their husbands go into overkill to show their hospitality.”

But the carpet is red for other reasons. As FPIF contributors Bahati Ntama Jacques and Beth Tuckey explain, the legacy that the U.S. president is leaving in Africa is a bloody one. “Bush knows that Rwanda’s involvement in the armed conflict in the DRC delays peace in eastern Congo, but he continues to authorize military aid to Rwanda,” they write in Rwanda and the War on Terror. “In 2007, the United States armed and trained Rwandan soldiers with $7.2 million from the U.S. defense program Africa Contingent Operations Training Assistance
(ACOTA) and $260,000 from the International Military and Education (IMET) program.”

The last stop on the trip was Liberia. As FPIF contributor Tim Newman points out in Rejecting Paternalism in Africa?, the Liberian case undercuts the president’s claim that he has boosted development on the continent. “Bush will end his trip by spending a few hours in Liberia,” Newman writes. “There he will try to cast himself in the role of the compassionate conservative who successfully intervened in Liberia’s long civil war, thus heralding in a shining new democracy led by Africa’s first democratically elected female president. In his
February 14 press conference, Bush celebrated increasing private capital flows to sub-Saharan Africa. But the workers supposedly benefiting from foreign private investment in Liberia might have a different perspective.”

A New State?

Kosovo, the predominantly Albanian enclave of Serbia, declared its formal independence last week. FPIF’s Ian Williams and Stephen Zunes both support the right of the Kosovars to self-determination. But they don’t see exactly eye to eye on the issue of recognizing the new state.

In our latest strategic dialogue, Ian Williams observes in A New Kosovo that “recognition of Kosovar independence has started with the United States and most of the European Union. Most Islamic countries
will probably follow suit, along with many non-aligned states. So far Belgrade has blustered and threatened to downgrade relations with the dozens of very important neighbors who will recognize Kosovo. But after the multiple defeats that Miloševic caused for Serbs,fortunately there is little appetite for military action.”

Stephen Zunes, in Kosovo and the Politics of Recognition, argues that the U.S. decision to recognize Kosovo, which President Bush announced during his Africa trip, was perhaps a bit hasty. He points to the potential for pushing Serbian toward right-wing extremism, the prospect of the Albanian minority in Macedonia pushing to join a greater Kosovo, and the encouraging of secessionist movements in the Caucasus. Finally, he notes, “the impact of Kosovo’s independence and recognition by the United States and other Western nations could also seriously worsen U.S.-Russian relations, exacerbating differences that hawks on both sides are warning could evolve into a ‘new Cold War.'”

After its recent elections, Pakistan almost qualifies as a new state. The victory of the opposition in the parliamentary elections may well herald the return of democracy to the ill-fated land. Alas, General Pervez Musharraf shows no signs of stepping aside, not when he still has America on his side. FPIF contributor Najum Mushtaq urges the United States to reconsider. “Washington should have reviewed its ill-directed, one-dimensional Pakistan policy long ago,” he writes in Letting Go of Musharraf. “Instead of persisting with the failed Musharraf option, Washington should put all its weight behind the new parliament, which represents the voice of the Pakistani people.

Breaking the Bank

The financial big boys are freaking out, reports FPIF columnist Walden Bello. George Soros and World Economic Forum host Klaus Schwab are suddenly sounding like the gravediggers of capitalism. “Skyrocketing oil prices, a falling dollar, and collapsing financial markets are the key ingredients in an economic brew that could end up
in more than just an ordinary recession,” Bello writes in Capitalism in an Apocalyptic Mood. “The falling dollar and rising oil prices have been rattling the global economy for some time. But it is the dramatic implosion of financial markets that is driving the financial elite to panic.”

You might think that U.S. politicians, when confronted with an escalating economic crisis, would reach into the biggest pot of money around to help get us out of the pickle. Not so.

President Bush’s treatment of the military budget as a sacred cow is at least consistent with his conduct over the last seven years. But what about the Democrats? As FPIF contributor William Hartung explains in Dems: What about the Military Budget?, “Not only have the major presidential candidates been largely silent on these record expenditures, but they want to increase them. Barack Obama has said we will probably need to ‘bump up’ the military budget in a new administration, and both he and Hillary Clinton have committed themselves to increasing the size of the armed forces by tens of thousands of troops.”

And Now for Something Completely Different

In our second installment of poetry to celebrate the upcoming Split This Rock poetry festival, FPIF contributor Susan Tichy reflects on what we think about when we think about war. Her American Ghazals, named after the Persian poetic form, describe a landscape of pain and fear, and yet in there too is beauty and compassion.

Finally, in the Russian tradition of “laughter through tears,” we present to you the job description for a great new opening: the head of Cuba.

FPIF’s humorist Alec Dubro provides the details: “The nation of Cuba is planning a massive restructuring that may or may not actually happen. Possible outcomes: become Chinese-model, free-market police state; acquire banana republic status; enter United States as a county of Florida; limp along without direction; or make the
transition to social democracy and prosperity. We want you to be part of this momentous change, or possibly stifle it.
Links

John Lindsay-Poland and Nick Morgan, “Overseas Military Bases and the Environment,” Foreign Policy In Focus (http://www.fpif.org/briefs/vol3/v3n15mil.html).

Tom Engelhardt, “The Million Year War,” Foreign Policy In Focus(http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4977); There’s a risk that the United States will never withdraw from Iraq.

Adil Shamoo, “The Enduring Trap in Iraq,” Foreign Policy In Focus(http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/5000); The Bush administration wants to place U.S. military troops and bases permanently on Iraqi soil despite strong objections from many Democrats.

Daniel Volman and Beth Tuckey, “Militarizing Africa (Again),” Foreign Policy In Focus (http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4997); With the new Africa Command, the United States is increasing its military presence on an energy-rich continent.

Joanne Landy and Thomas Harrison, “Pushing Missile Defense in Europe,” Foreign Policy In Focus (http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/5005); The United States wants to establish bases in Poland and the Czech
Republic – over the objections of the citizens of those countries.

Tajudeen Abdulraheem, “Welcome President Bush!” Foreign Policy In Focus (http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/5002); Not only examines President Bush’s Africa trip itinerary, country by country, but also why he is visiting the continent in the first place.

Bahati Ntama Jacques and Beth Tuckey, “Rwanda and the War on Terror,” Foreign Policy In Focus (http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4999); U.S. administrations allow narrowly defined “national interests” – instead
of needs, priorities, and realities in a given country – to dictate foreign assistance. And Rwanda happens to be a perfect example.

Tim Newman, “Rejecting Paternalism in Africa?” Foreign Policy In Focus (http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4973); Does President Bush’s view of trade and investment on workers in Africa truly end paternalism?

Ian Williams, “A New Kosovo,” Foreign Policy In Focus (http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4992); Kosovo has declared its independence from Serbia. But there are still a few obstacles in the path of statehood.

Stephen Zunes, “Kosovo and the Politics of Recognition,” Foreign Policy In Focus (http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/5006); The United States should have thought twice about rushing to recognize the new state of Kosovo.

Najum Mushtaq, “Letting Go of Musharraf,” Foreign Policy In Focus (http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/5004); It’s time for Washington to wake up and smell the elections.

Walden Bello, “Capitalism in an Apocalyptic Mood,” Foreign Policy In Focus (http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4996); Even the world’s top financiers are beginning to panic.

William Hartung, “Dems: What about the Military Budget?” Foreign Policy In Focus (http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/5009); The Democratic candidates will debate each other, but not the metastasizing military budget.

Split This Rock Poetry Festival: http://www.splitthisrock.org/

Susan Tichy, “American Ghazals,” Foreign Policy In Focus (http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/5008); What we think about when we think about war.

Alec Dubro, “Job Opening (Cuba),” Foreign Policy In Focus (http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/5007); Tired of your current job? Want more executive responsibility, good health care benefits, warmer weather? Cuba may want you.

Crash grounds Guard’s F-15 jets

HonoluluAdvertiser.com

Posted on: Sunday, February 3, 2008

Crash grounds Guard’s F-15 jets

By William Cole
Advertiser Military Writer

The 13 Hawai’i Air National Guard F-15s that were cleared to fly on Jan. 9 are grounded again – except for air defense missions – following the ocean crash Friday of an F-15D.

The pilot, still unidentified by the Air Guard, is at home after he ejected from the Eagle fighter as it lost altitude and control 60 miles south of O’ahu at about 1:37 p.m., officials said.

“He’s not able to grant any interviews yet because of the investigation going on,” said Capt. Jeff Hickman, a Hawai’i National Guard spokesman. “Also, he’s not ready to talk about it yet.”

That pilot did not suffer any broken bones and was alert and walking after being rescued by Coast Guard swimmers.

The Hawai’i Air National Guard’s 20 A, B, C and D model F-15 jets were grounded three times between early November and December after a Missouri Air National Guard F-15C broke apart on Nov. 2.

The pilot ejected and suffered a dislocated shoulder and shattered arm.

Thirteen of 20 Hawai’i Air National Guard F-15 fighter jets stationed at Hickam Air Force Base returned to the air on Jan. 9 after all were examined.

The 199th Fighter Squadron’s remaining F-15 Eagles had remained grounded and were awaiting clearance from Air Combat Command on the Mainland before Friday’s crash and what amounts to a fourth grounding.

A Safety Investigation Board will be convened this week to investigate the circumstances surrounding the crash and make a recommendation to prevent similar occurrences.

The Air Force has said in the past that such a board can include pilots, maintenance personnel and airframe specialists from around the Air Force and Defense Department.

Hickman said they will interview the pilot, and listen to flight recordings before the $28 million jet crashed.

The pilot has been taken off flying status and will assist with the investigation, Hickman said.

The Safety Investigation Board will have about 30 days to investigate and forward conclusions to the convening authority, but the results won’t be made public.

Because the crash is defined as a “Class A” mishap involving costs exceeding $1 million, an Accident Investigation Board also will be convened after the safety investigation.

It also will have about 30 days to report, the results of which will be released to the public.

Hickman said the Coast Guard recovered a small amount of debris from the crash site and the life raft that the pilot used after ejecting and parachuting into 12-foot swells.

Hickman said there will be no routine training flights in the 13 F-15s that were previously cleared to fly, but the “alert” mission for homeland defense sometimes involves practice launches.

The 199th Squadron has 27 pilots who fly the F-15.

Reach William Cole at wcole@honoluluadvertiser.com.

Crashed F-15 passed safety inspection 3 weeks ago

F-15 crash is unlike earlier one, says general

Plane that crashed had passed safety inspection 3 weeks ago

STORY SUMMARY »

A safety team arrives this week to investigate Friday’s F-15 crash south of Oahu, but the Hawaii Air National Guard’s 154th Wing commander said the cause does not appear to be related to structural problems that grounded the Air Force’s entire fleet of F-15s in November.

Brig. Gen. Peter Pawling said the fighter in Friday’s crash was in one piece before the crash. The pilot of the plane was able to eject safely and was released from the Queen’s Medical Center to recuperate at home, a guard spokesman said.

Military analysts said Friday’s crash underscores the Air Force’s need to replace the fleet in the near future.

FULL STORY »

By Gene Park
gpark@starbulletin.com

Although an investigation into Friday’s F-15D crash is ongoing, the Hawaii Air National Guard’s 154th Wing commander said he doesn’t believe the crash was related to the structural problems that grounded all Air Force F-15 for two months.

The F-15D jet that crashed was just put back into service three weeks ago, after undergoing safety inspections.

“The airplane (in Friday’s crash) was still in one piece,” said Brig. Gen. Peter Pawling, commander of the 154th Wing, of Friday’s crash 60 miles south of the Honolulu airport. “There was no inflight breakup.”

All 676 Air Force F-15s were grounded in November after an F-15C broke in two during a training flight in Missouri. An investigation concluded that a defective aluminum beam in the frame cracked.

Hawaii’s F-15s are about 30 years old and were acquired in 1987.

But Pawling said it’s too early to link the plane’s age to the crash, pending the ongoing investigation.

“It could very well be true, but it’s something we’re going to have to scrutinize,” Pawling said.

The Guard has yet to decide whether to retrieve the jet from the ocean bottom, although Pawling said he would like it retrieved. The F-15D models cost about $29.9 million each.

U.S. Coast Guard was able to recover two trash bags and two trash cans full of debris, said Capt. Jeff Hickman, spokesman for the Air Guard.

A safety investigation team comprised of Air Force and Guard officials will assemble in Hawaii this week to investigate the crash.

The plane’s pilot ejected safely at about 1:37 Friday afternoon. The pilot said he could not control the plane and started to lose altitude before the crash, Maj. Gen. Robert Lee said Friday. The plane experienced no problems during a routine exercise earlier that day.

All training missions involving the fighters have been halted, including a mock aerial combat test with the Navy’s newest F-18 Super Hornets.

Pawling said he aims to resume training by Thursday, but wants to focus resources on gathering more information about the crash.

“It’s kind of an emotional experience for us,” Pawling said. “So this will give us a chance to regroup a little bit before we get back into the flying business.”

Hawaii Air Guard F-15s remain on duty to fly, if needed, for air defense missions, Lee said.

The Air Force cleared 13 Hawaii-based F-15s to return to flight duty on Jan. 9. But seven fighters remain grounded pending certification from the Pentagon.

Friday’s crash is the fifth F-15 crash since May of last year.

Some experts who follow military readiness say Friday’s incident is another indication that the F-15 needs to be replaced.

The fighters were designed during the Vietnam War, said Loren Thompson, chief operating officer of the Lexington Institute, an Arlington, Va.-based public policy think tank.

“The F-15 fleet is starting to literally fall out of the sky,” Thompson said. “Even before the planes started crashing, they were flying on flight restrictions because of metal fatigue.”

It’s too early to tell what Friday’s crash may mean for the F-15s future since the cause has not been identified, said John Pike, director of Virginia-based online database GlobalSecurity.org.

“Having said that, these planes have been around for a long time,” Pike said. “You can foresee a time when they’re going to phase out the F-15.”

The Air Force would like to replace the F-15 with the new F-22. Hawaii’s planes are scheduled to be replaced in 2010.

But the F-22 program is under fire because of its cost — about $159 million per plane.

Recent F-15 crashes

Friday’s F-15 crash here was the fifth crash since May of last year. The other incidents were:

» Nov. 2: A Missouri Air National Guard F-15 broke apart in midair, injuring the pilot. The cause was blamed on structural problems.

» June 26: An F-15 from the Oregon Air National Guard’s 142nd Fighter Wing went down in the Pacific Ocean during a training mission with other aircraft, killing the pilot.

» June 11: an F-15C fighter collided in midair with an F-16C and crashed near Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska during a training exercise.

» May 30: A Missouri Air National Guard F-15 crashed in southwestern Indiana during a training mission with the Indiana Air National Guard.

Source: http://archives.starbulletin.com/2008/02/03/news/story02.html

F-15 jet crashes into sea off Oahu

F-15 jet crashes into sea off Oahu

The National Guard pilot is safe after he ejects and parachutes into the roiling water

STORY SUMMARY »

The pilot of a Hawaii Air National Guard fighter jet is reported in good condition after he ejected safely yesterday afternoon from an F-15D that crashed into the ocean about 60 miles south of Honolulu Airport.

The fighter jet, which had been returned to service just three weeks ago, was on a routine training mission at about 1:37 p.m. when the pilot lost control of the plane and ejected, officials said.

A Coast Guard team rescued the pilot at 2:15 p.m.

The Air Force grounded all of its F-15 Eagle jets following the catastrophic failure of a Missouri-based F-15C jet in November.

Thirteen of Hawaii’s F-15s were returned to service Jan. 9 after being cleared for flight. Another seven planes are awaiting clearance.

An investigation into the Missouri crash concluded that a defective aluminum beam in the frame cracked. Another probe found that more than 150 of the military’s F-15s also had the flawed beams.

The Hawaii Air National Guard has halted all training flights but will continue to fly missions related to the defense of the islands, said Maj. Gen. Robert Lee, Hawaii National Guard commander.

FULL STORY »

By Leila Fujimori
lfujimori@starbulletin.com

The Hawaii Air National Guard halted all training missions by its F-15 jet fighters after yesterday’s crash off Oahu’s southern coast, the first in the Guard’s history, said Maj. Gen. Robert G.F. Lee, state adjutant general.

The F-15s “will still continue to maintain the alert status to provide air defense for the state of Hawaii,” he said, which includes periodic alert flights.

The F-15D jet fighter that crashed yesterday was one of 13 Hawaii Air National Guard jets that returned to service Jan. 9 after extensive inspections.

The Air Force grounded all 676 F-15s worldwide after an F-15C broke in two during a routine training flight in Missouri in November. An investigation concluded that a defective aluminum beam in the frame cracked. Another probe found that more than 150 of the military’s F-15s also had the flawed beams.

Seven of the 20 Hawaii-based F-15s belonging to the Air Guard’s 199th Fighter Squadron remain grounded pending word from Washington, Lee said.

The Hawaii Air National Guard pilot ejected safely at about 1:37 p.m. and was in good spirits and in good condition after his rescue, said Capt. Jeff Hickman, a spokesman for the Hawaii National Guard.

“It was the first time we’ve had a pilot have to eject and lose the plane” since the F-15s were acquired in 1987, Lee said.

The pilot, whose identity was not released, had extensive flight experience, Lee said.

The pilot said he could not control the plane and started to lose altitude before the crash, according to Lee. That was when he made the decision to eject and parachuted to the water 60 miles south of Honolulu.

Lee said the plane had experienced no problems during a routine training exercise earlier in the day.

An investigation, likely to take 30 days or more, is under way into the cause of the crash, Hickman said.

A Coast Guard rescue swimmer hoisted the pilot aboard a helicopter at about 2:15 p.m. yesterday about 60 miles south of Honolulu Airport and flew him in good condition to the Queen’s Medical Center for observation, authorities said.

Helicopter pilot Lt. Will Johnson said two other F-15 pilots maintained contact with the downed pilot, reported he was in the water but uninjured, and assisted in locating him.

There was no sign of the jet, but they found the bright green dye marker the pilot left, he said.

Rescue swimmer Petty Officer Dave Burns jumped about 15 feet from the helicopter into 10- to 12-foot swells.

“He was already sitting in his life raft, just waiting for us to pick him up,” Burns said.

The downed pilot walked off the helicopter at Queen’s and shook everyone’s hands.

“It’s definitely a good day when you can bail out of a plane and walk away,” Johnson said.

The Coast Guard dispatched two helicopters and a C-130 plane from Air Station Barbers Point after being notified of the crash at 1:45 p.m. The Coast Guard also sent out the Ahi, an 87-foot patrol boat, and the Kukui, a 225-foot buoy tender, whose crews checked for pollution and debris.

The Associated Press contributed to this story.

Source: http://archives.starbulletin.com/2008/02/02/news/story01.html

F-15 fighter jet crashes off O’ahu

HonoluluAdvertiser.com

Posted on: Saturday, February 2, 2008

Crash raises scrutiny of F-15 fighter jet

By William Cole and Mary Vorsino
Advertiser Staff Writers

The ditching of a Hawai’i Air National Guard F-15D fighter yesterday was at least the fifth crash nationwide for the Eagles since May and will result in even greater scrutiny for an aging aircraft that has been grounded several times in recent months.

The fighter crashed yesterday in the ocean 60 miles south of O’ahu at about 1:37 p.m. after the pilot lost altitude and control, officials said.

“The pilot ejected. He’s safe,” said Capt. Jeff Hickman, a Hawai’i National Guard spokesman.

Hickman said there were two of the twin-tail fighters doing routine “air-to-air” training.

Two Coast Guard cutters were on the scene of the crash, and the pilot was picked up by helicopter and taken to The Queen’s Medical Center, where he was in good condition yesterday evening.

The National Guard did not release the pilot’s name or age, but said he was an experienced pilot.

The pilot’s family was with him at Queen’s and officials said he was in good spirits.

The outcome was far different than the crash of a Missouri Air National Guard F-15C in early November in which the aircraft broke apart and led to a worldwide grounding of the F-15 fleet. The Missouri pilot’s arm was shattered and his shoulder was dislocated.

The Hawai’i Air Guard pilot did not suffer any broken bones.

“He’s a tough guy,” Maj. Gen. Robert G.F. Lee, the head of the Hawai’i National Guard, said of the pilot. “He was up, walking around, smiling, had his family there – so we’re all happy that he’s in good shape.”

Lee said the pilot, who was flying solo in the twin-seat aircraft, “was getting to the point where he said, ‘Hey, I’m getting kind of low, if I can’t control it, I better punch out.’ ”

Lee said he couldn’t release altitude information, but the pilot was “at the low end” of the minimum for ejecting. His ejection seat parachute deployed properly.

Three rescue aircraft crews from Coast Guard Air Station Barbers Point and crewmembers aboard the Coast Guard cutter Ahi, an 87-foot patrol boat, immediately responded to the incident. The Coast Guard was alerted at 1:45 p.m., a release said.

“He seemed OK for having just crashed,” said Coast Guard rescue swimmer Dave Burns, who hoisted the pilot out of the seas with swells up to 12 feet. “It just seemed like he was ready to get out of there. He wasn’t injured. He wasn’t disoriented.”

Burns said the pilot was in a life raft when the Coast Guard arrived. The rescue swimmer jumped into the waves, swam over to the jet pilot and made sure he was OK.

The pilot thanked the crew several times after the rescue, Burns said. Once the helicopter landed, the pilot was able to walk, he said. Coast Guard Lt. Will Johnson, the pilot of the Coast Guard helicopter, said there
was an oil sheen in the water and a smell of oil in the area around where the fighter pilot was rescued.

But Johnson said he saw no wreckage from the downed F-15.

The rescue was Burns’ first time saving someone in the water. “We train for this type of stuff,” Burns said. “I’m just glad the guy was OK. It was a good day for both of us.”

Lee, the state’s adjutant general, had thanks for the Coast Guard, “because as soon as our (operations center) called, their help was there in short time to pick him up.”

Hickman said the second F-15 maintained visual contact with the downed pilot.

Crewmembers from the cutter Ahi, the cutter Kukui, a 225-foot buoy tender, and Coast Guard aircraft crews were remaining on scene to check for pollution and debris.

A crash investigation will take at least 30 days, officials said.

The F-15 is part of the 199th Fighter Squadron, 154th Wing of the Hawai’i Air National Guard.

Before yesterday, the squadron was approaching a record 80,000 hours of accident-free flying in the F-15, Hickman said earlier. Around the late 1960s, a Hawai’i Guard F-4 Phantom pilot did have to eject because of a fuel problem, he said.

The F-15s serve in a homeland defense role for the state. The aircraft also are available for worldwide taskings.

The 63-foot-long F-15s, which can fly faster than 1,875 mph, or Mach 2.5 plus, were deployed to Iraq in 2000 for no-fly-zone duty and patrolled the skies above Honolulu after the 9/11 attacks.

Thirteen of 20 Hawai’i Air National Guard F-15s stationed at Hickam Air Force Base returned to the air in mid-January after the fighters were grounded worldwide on Nov. 3. The day before, an Air National Guard F-15C in Missouri experienced catastrophic structural failure and broke apart in flight during basic maneuver training.

The entire U.S. Air Force F-15 fleet was grounded after the Nov. 2 Missouri crash. The A through D model jets were cleared to fly, but then were regrounded on Nov. 28, and again in early December after another problem aircraft was found.

The newest model, the F-15E, continued to fly and is being used in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In June, an F-15 from the Oregon Air National Guard crashed in the Pacific Ocean on a training mission. Also in June, one of the jets crashed near Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska. And in May, an F-15 went down in southwestern Indiana during training.

The Hawai’i Guard’s seven other F-15 Eagles remain grounded and await clearance to fly from Air Combat Command on the Mainland.

Hawai’i has A, B, C and D models that are on average 25 years old, officials said. The plane that crashed was a newer D model F-15 valued at $28 million.

The Hawai’i Air National Guard first received F-15s in 1987, replacing F-4 Phantoms.

The Hawai’i aircraft flying yesterday has two seats, although officials said there was only the one pilot in the crashed aircraft.

Guard officials said they did not believe the F-15 crash was related to ongoing training at Kane’ohe Bay.

The Navy said last month that F-15 Eagles were to be used in an adversary role as eight U.S. Navy F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet jets from Air Test and Evaluation Squadron Nine were conducting flight operations at Kane’ohe Bay through Feb. 20.

The Navy was to work with the Hawai’i Guard’s 199th Fighter Squadron to test the Navy’s newest fighter aircraft technologies. The Guard’s 199th Fighter Squadron also was expected to conduct operations in and out of the air facility throughout the testing period, said Navy Lt. Mark Huber, a public affairs officer.

The F-15s at Hickam will be replaced by F-22 A Raptors with stealth technology starting in late 2011.

A Coast Guard rescue crew hoisted a downed F-15 Hawai’i Air National Guard pilot from waters about 60 miles south of O’ahu yesterday afternoon. The unidentified pilot was not hurt.

The Washington Post contributed to this report.

Reach William Cole at wcole@honoluluadvertiser.com and Mary Vorsino at mvorsino@honoluluadvertiser.com.
• • •

0822-ha-f15-crash

Range of failures led to Army collision with Aiea overpass

Posted on: Sunday, July 29, 2007

Range of failures led to Aiea overpass crash

By William Cole
Advertiser Military Writer

hawaii707290359ar_b

Traffic on the H-1 came to a standstill on a Tuesday afternoon nearly a year ago after an ‘Aiea crash closed all six westbound lanes.

ADVERTISER LIBRARY PHOTOS | Sept. 5, 2006

hawaii707290359v1_b

A soldier is seen adjusting the Army rig’s equipment after it hit an ‘Aiea overpass.

ADVERTISER LIBRARY PHOTO | Sept. 5, 2006

Last year’s crash of a military truck and excavator into an ‘Aiea overpass, which led to one of the worst traffic tie-ups in state history, was the result of widespread misunderstanding by soldiers as to what constituted a “convoy,” a breakdown in responsibility, a failure to use an escort vehicle and a rush to get on the road.

It all could have been avoided had someone simply used a measuring tape to figure out the height of the load.

Those are among the findings of an Army investigation obtained by The Advertiser into the 1:30 p.m. accident on Sept. 5, 2006, on the ‘Ewa-bound H-1 Freeway, which paralyzed O’ahu roadways and affected tens of thousands on a day that was dubbed “Black Tuesday.”

“Not one piece of documentation required for this operation was completed to standard,” reported Lt. Col. Tracy E. McLean, the investigating officer.

An excavator with a 4-foot hydraulic hammer attachment was atop the Army semi-trailer when the rig slammed into the concrete overpass at between 45 and 55 mph.

The 18 1/2-foot-tall heavy machinery was more than 2 feet taller than the bottom of the footbridge, which has a maximum allowable height of 14 feet for vehicles.

The crash created an explosion of dust and rubble.

“For a few seconds, I just couldn’t see. You couldn’t see nothing,” said Leslie Kumia, who was driving a green 1994 Ford next to the truck.

Scott Ishikawa, spokesman for the state Department of Transportation, said some witnesses reported seeing the bridge buckle. Baseball-sized pieces of concrete hailed down.

“We’re fortunate we didn’t have a kid walking on that overpass at the time, because it’s meant for the schools,” Ishikawa said.

All six westbound lanes of the H-1 were shut down.

It was described as the perfect storm – an accident at the worst place at the worst time. Traffic backed up like water rushing into a clogged sink.

FAR-REACHING IMPACTS

But “Black Tuesday” has had ramifications far beyond the stories of bumper-to-bumper gridlock, half-day commutes and tourists walking to the airport, bags in hand.

An approximately $600,000 bill is still being finalized by the state Department of Transportation for delivery to the Army for the cost of tearing down the old overpass and putting up a new one.

The Army paid about $200,000 for damage and loss of use of the excavator, which was rented from Western Machinery in Kapolei, a company representative said. Costs for the Honolulu Police Department and TheBus being billed to the Army total another $26,700.

Meanwhile, an afternoon rush Zipper Lane on the H-1 is being considered that could double as an emergency contra-flow bypass.

The Honolulu Police Department’s District 3, which extends from Red Hill to Kunia, developed an emergency response plan with predetermined turn-offs and staffing requirements should something similar happen again.

Civil Defense stands ready to pass the word more quickly to TV and radio stations and newspapers.

The ensuing Army investigation found plenty of blame to go around, from the highest levels of the 29th Engineer Battalion and its 82nd Engineer Company down to the driver of the M1916A3 truck, 36-year-old Sgt. R.J. Eugin Jr.

“No one from the battalion commander on down could clearly articulate when a convoy clearance was required,” investigator McLean wrote. “Most people thought that if you send the vehicles out in groups of five or less, no convoy clearance was required, which is a misinterpretation of the regulation.”

The 25th Infantry Division convoy commander’s guide states that convoy clearances are required even if a single vehicle is involved if the vehicle requires a special hauling permit.

Had an escort vehicle been used, “the escort vehicle would likely have noticed the load was too tall before the collision with the bridge occurred,” McLean said.

Maj. Curtis Edson, the 29th Engineer Battalion’s operations officer, said in the report that the rig hit the lighting supports of at least three overhead signs before striking the overpass.

STRUGGLE FOR REPORT

The Advertiser obtained the more than 500-page Army Article 15-6 investigation through a Freedom of Information Act request, which the U.S. Army Garrison, Hawai’i, first rejected in February, saying the information was “exempt from disclosure.”

An appeal to the Pentagon reversed the garrison’s earlier refusal, but the Army still redacted multiple pages, saying some of the information was classified and its release would damage national security.

The Army said the 8th Theater Sustainment Command, the 29th Engineer Battalion’s higher headquarters at Fort Shafter, took nonjudicial, or administrative, action against leaders and soldiers involved.

Penalties included fines, reduction in grade and letters of reprimand.

But the Army said, “We will not discuss the specific actions nor release the names of the individuals disciplined due to privacy act concerns.”

“The Army immediately accepted responsibility for this accident and deeply regrets the impacts that the accident had on individuals and families throughout the island,” the service said in e-mailed responses to Advertiser questions. “The findings and recommendations from the investigation were used to modify our internal procedures to prevent a similar accident. We pride ourselves as being good neighbors and want to do our part to ensure something like this doesn’t happen again.”

The accident occurred after U.S. Army, Pacific, at Fort Shafter tasked the 82nd Engineer Company to demolish a bachelors’ quarters on Kwajalein Atoll.

Two excavators were leased for the project, including the 330 LX HYEX involved in the accident.

On June 6, unit equipment deployed from Schofield Barracks. Following the demolition work, the excavators were loaded on a barge on Aug. 9 and 10 for the voyage back to Pearl Harbor and arrived the morning of Sept. 5.

‘NO ONE … UNDERSTOOD’

That morning, there were 18 vehicles that had to travel from Pearl Harbor to Schofield, including oversized vehicles requiring special hauling permits and Army convoy clearance permission, “but no one at the company or battalion level understood this requirement,” McLean, the Army’s investigating officer, said in her report.

“There was clearly a lack of supervision and oversight at all levels within the company to ensure required paperwork for this operation was completed to standard,” she said. “During this operation, there was also a lack of discipline at the lowest levels to fill out even the most basic and routine paperwork.”

Eugin, the driver of the truck that hit the overpass, was tapped for the job when he arrived at the port that morning because there was a shortage of drivers.

In testimony, he said he had moved oversized pieces of equipment on Hawai’i highways four to five times in late 2005, and to the best of his knowledge, without DOT permits.

There was a “safety briefing” that morning covering speeds on the barge and docks and highway height restrictions, but Eugin said no one measured the load and he was not aware of the requirement to have escort vehicles.

Pfc. Bobi Jo Tieden was the “truck commander” of the vehicle, but the investigation said she had not been in the Army long and she did not have enough experience to perform her duties.

Tieden, 20, said when the rig hit the overpass, “the truck and trailer did a jack-knife effect, we were jerked and then came to a stop on the interstate.”

Eugin was negligent for departing without measuring the load and without escort vehicles, McLean said.

The convoy commander, meanwhile, failed to direct subordinates to remove a 4-foot hydraulic hammer from the excavator that made the load 18 1/2 feet tall, the report said. Had it been removed, the height would have been under 14 1/2 feet, and the equipment would have cleared the overpass.

The company commander thought it was the company executive officer’s responsibility to submit the permit to haul oversized equipment, McLean stated.

The responsibility actually falls to the company unit movement/safety officer, but she stated she never received training or guidance on her duties, and was not at the port, according to the investigation.

Additionally, there were “some difficulties” off-loading the barge that morning, and haste to get on the highway before a convoy cut-off time of 4 to 6 p.m., the report found.

NEW PROCEDURES

As a result of McLean’s recommendations, the Army said the unit involved has implemented new procedures, checks and instructions to improve the safety of the military vehicles operating in Hawai’i.

Those procedures have been shared with other units so they can implement their own safety procedures.

Among the changes, no over-sized vehicles will be transported without the specific approval of the battalion-level commander and only after proper convoy clearance and other permits are obtained and a comprehensive risk assessment is done.

Shortly after the accident, the state DOT said the Army had rarely applied for oversize load permits to transport equipment like the excavator. Instead, it relied on a contractor for much of the hauling.

The DOT’s Ishikawa said the permits office was getting one or two oversize and overweight load applications a month from the military and military contractors before the accident.

But since then, “Just this year alone, we have about 200 permit applications,” he said. “I think there’s better communication now between the DOT and the military.”

Part of the permit’s purpose is to lay out the best route to take.

Honolulu Police Maj. Debora Tandal, commander of HPD’s District 3, developed a plan to staff key intersections and divert traffic if something similar happens again.

“It’s more uniform now,” Tandal said. “So it wouldn’t be a matter of deciding we’d have (traffic control) at certain intersections. The intersections are identified.”

Ishikawa said thought is being given to having an afternoon rush Zipper Lane, and creating more openings in the H-1 median to divert traffic to the other side in the event of a highway calamity.

“It would probably be one or two lanes, but still, it’s better than no lanes,” he said.

Reach William Cole at wcole@honoluluadvertiser.com.

THE ACCIDENT

On Sept. 5, 2006, at 1:30 p.m., an Army semi-trailer hauling a rented excavator slammed into the ‘Aiea pedestrian overpass at 45 to 55 mph. The mauka portion of the overpass was damaged beyond repair, and transportation officials closed down the entire westbound H-1 Freeway for more than 12 hours.

THE INVESTIGATION

The Army concluded that the accident was the result of widespread misunderstanding by soldiers as to what constitutes a “convoy,” a breakdown in responsibility, a failure to use an escort vehicle and a rush to get on the road. Penalties against soldiers involved included fines, reduction in grade and letters of reprimand.

THE OUTCOME

Honolulu police developed an emergency response plan with pre-determined turnoffs and staffing requirements should something similar happen again. An afternoon rush-hour Zipper Lane on H-1 is being considered to double as an emergency contra-flow bypass.

THE ACCIDENT’S COST, BY THE NUMBERS

8 hours

How long it took some people to get home. Walking in any westerly direction on the town side of the overpass was usually faster than driving.

103 days

How long it took before a new pedestrian walkway opened. Crews cut out the damaged section of overpass in record time.

$826,000

Minimum the Army will pay for the overpass replacement, damage to the rented crane, and for HPD, TheBus maintenance costs associated with the accident.

Source: http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2007/May/25/ln/FP705250379.html/?print=on

Military cargo plane and passenger jet nearly collide in Honolulu

Posted on: Friday, May 25, 2007

It’s close call for C-130, go! jet

By Dan Nakaso
Advertiser Staff Writer

A C-130 military cargo plane came close to crossing the path of a go! passenger jet taking off from Honolulu International Airport at about 100 mph, the Federal Aviation Administration said.

“I’ve seen other incidents throughout my career but this was by far the closest,” air traffic controller Thom Gurule said yesterday. “I hate the term ‘near miss.’ This was a ‘near hit.’ I don’t want to see anything any closer.”

It was the second “runway incursion” since December at Honolulu International Airport, according to the FAA.

The C-130 pilot had just landed on Runway 4 Right and pointed the nose of his C-130 toward the path of a go! Bombardier jet taking off on Runway 8 Left, said FAA regional spokesman Ian Gregor and air traffic controller Scott Sorenson.

The pilot crossed the “hold bars” – the lines on the taxiway – and was only 110 feet from the runway edge, Gregor said, “but didn’t intrude onto the runway itself.”

The FAA ranks runway incursions from “A” – a crash or near collision – to “D,” a technical violation, Gregor said. The last incident in Honolulu in December was rated a “D,” Gregor said.

Neither the FAA nor Hickam Air Force Base, which shares runways with the Honolulu airport, could confirm which branch of the military the C-130 pilot flies for. Hickam spokeswoman Lt. Melanie McLean said the C-130 involved is not based at Hickam.

C-130s are flown by the Air Force, Navy, Marines and Coast Guard, McLean said.

She added that Hickam’s Safety Office is investigating the incident.

The Safety Office “thought it was minor in nature,” she said. “They said the aircraft and the pilots were in no danger.”

m174558525

JAPAN-BASED C-130 PILOT

Honolulu airport had two runway incursions in the fiscal year that ended Oct. 1, 2006, and three in the year to Oct. 1, 2005, Gregor said.

The FAA lists the latest runway incursion as occurring on Sunday. But air traffic controller Gurule said it was definitely 7:44 p.m. Saturday night.

The C-130 pilot was based out of Japan, Gurule said.

He twice gave the pilot instructions to “exit at Taxiway Echo, turn left, cross Runway 4 Left, then turn left on Taxiway Bravo, which runs parallel to Taxiway 8 Left,” Gregor said. “But the C-130 pilot didn’t make the left turn on Taxiway B. He kept going straight on, heading straight toward Runway 8, where the regional jet was on its take-off.”

The go! jet – known as Air Shuttle 1018 – was pointed in the diamondhead direction of Runway 8 and had just gotten permission from Gurule to take off.

Gurule then looked up just in time to see that the C-130 had not turned onto Taxiway B and instead was on the makai side of the runway facing the terminals – rolling directly into the path of the oncoming go! jet.

SPLIT-SECOND REACTION

Gurule said the C-130 pilot “was definitely in a very dangerous place to be.” The go! pilot was bearing down “past the point of no return,” Gurule said.

Gurule said he yelled at the C-130 pilot to “hold your position. … And he just stopped abruptly.”

Sorenson said Gurule “didn’t have two seconds or one second to think. It was a split-second, gut reaction to yell out to stop the pilot. Had he waited one or two seconds longer, we would definitely be talking about a different set of circumstances.”

Air Shuttle 1018 then lifted into the air in front of the C-130 and a nervous pilot came on the radio.

“There was a slight moment of silence,” Gurule said. “I asked Air Shuttle 1018, ‘Are you OK?’ You could tell the pilot was absolutely shaken up. His response was, ‘It was a little crazy for a second but we’re OK.’ Then he was concerned that maybe he did something wrong. His question to me was, ‘I was cleared for take-off, wasn’t I?'”

Gurule then directed the C-130 pilot to contact the tower about a possible “pilot deviation” and had no further contact with him.

The FAA continues to investigate the incident.

Reach Dan Nakaso at dnakaso@honoluluadvertiser.com.

Source: http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2007/May/25/ln/FP705250379.html/?print=on

Aiea overpass repairs to begin

Aiea overpass repairs to start Monday night

Two westbound lanes of the H-1 freeway will be closed after 9 p.m.

art9a

STAR-BULLETIN / SEPTEMBER 2006
The Aiea Heights Drive and Kaamilo Street overpasses frame a pedestrian overpass closed since Sept. 6 after it was struck by an oversize load being carried on an Army truck. Repair work on the pedestrian overpass is scheduled to begin Monday night.

Star-Bulletin staff
citydesk@starbulletin.com

Repair work is scheduled to begin Monday night on an Aiea pedestrian overpass that has been closed since it was struck Sept. 6 by an oversize load being carried on an Army truck.

Two of the six Ewa-bound lanes of the H-1 freeway will be closed after 9 p.m. Monday through Thursday while Hawaiian Dredging Construction Co. crews do preliminary repairs on the concrete bridge.

Two right lanes will be closed Monday and Tuesday nights, and two left lanes will be closed Wednesday and Thursday. The lane closures will end at 3:15 a.m., according to the state Department of Transportation.

The westbound freeway will be closed to traffic between the Halawa Interchange and the Waiau Interchange in Pearl City for one night during the week of Dec. 3. The contractor will install a precast section that will restore passage on the walkway.

The cost of the reconstruction is estimated at $500,000, said Scott Ishikawa, Transportation Department spokesman. That includes the $150,000 tab for demolition work done Sept. 6 after the accident. The state shut down that stretch of freeway for eight hours after the accident after officials deemed it unsafe to let traffic pass with the threat of concrete falling on vehicles.

An investigation determined that the boom of the hydraulic excavator being hauled in an Army tractor-trailer was 4 1/2 feet higher than the legal limit of 14 feet. The Army suspended the licenses of the driver and assistant driver.

The state decided to rebuild the 80-foot-long pedestrian overpass because there are schools on each end, Alvah Scott Elementary School on the makai side and Aiea High School on the mauka end.

The section of overpass over the eastbound lanes is a free-standing structure and did not need repair.
Source: http://archives.starbulletin.com/2006/11/25/news/story09.html