Army helicopter training enroaching on Mauna Kea

As reported previously on this site, the Army proposes to conduct High Altitude Mountainous Environmental Training (HAMET) on the slopes of Mauna Kea.    This training would take place outside of the training areas currently under Army control.   The Army has just posted the Environmental Assessment (EA), Appendices and Draft Fining of No Significant Impact on its website.

The EA confirms that  the Army has conducted this type of aviation training on Mauna Kea in 2003, 2004 and 2006.  Why did the Department of Land and Natural Resources approve the training without any public comment or notification? Here is a disturbing revelation on page 2-6 of the EA:

In November (2003), while performing high-altitude training on the slopes of Mauna Kea, a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter landed about 3.5 miles (6 kilometers) east of the designated LZs within the Mauna Kea Ice Age Natural Area Reserve (NAR) within the boundaries of the Mauna Kea Adze Quarry. Subsequent to the incident, the Army was requested to implement additional mitigations to avoid future-related impacts during the training period (Young 2003).

What are they training for?  To fly in the high altitude environment of Afghanistan.  Empire is a constant state of war.  Tell the Army what you think about this training:

Comments are due January 24, 2011. They can be emailed to: William.Rogers5@us.army.mil, or mailed to: Directorate of Public Works, Environmental Division (IMPC-HI-PWE), Attn: Mr. William Rogers, 947 Wright Avenue, Wheeler Army Airfield, Schofield Barracks, 96857-5013.

Army wants more helicopter training on Mauna Kea after violating Mauna Kea Ice Age Reserve

In addition to plans to expand Army training facilities in the Pohakuloa Training Area, the Army recently issued a notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for impelementation of High Altitude Mountainous Environmental Training (HAMET) on the slopes of the sacred mountain, Mauna Kea.

According to Marti Townsend of KAHEA, the area that the Army is proposing to use is state land (ceded lands) set aside as a forest reserve for the birds.

In the past, the Army has been granted a “right of entry” permit to use the forest reserve for “touch-n-go” type helicopter exercises and also overnight “set up camp in a hurry” type trainings. The permit is issued by the Division Of Forestry And Wildlife Head, Paul Conroy, meaning that it does not come before the Board of Land and Natural Resources in a public hearing. The public was not notified of the previous right of entry permits issued to the Army.

However, we have learned that an Army helicopter landed in the Mauna Kea Ice Age Natural Areas Reserve during a training exercise in violation of the permit. This prompted the state to require the Army to complete an Environmental Assessment pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

Below is the excerpt from The Environmental Notice published on Dec. 23rd. Deadline for comments to the Army is January 24, 2011.

>><<

High Altitude Mountainous Environmental Training, Pōhakuloa Training Area, Island of Hawai‘i

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act, an Environmental Assessment (EA) and draft Finding of No Significant Impact (FNSI) have been prepared for the implementation of proposed High Altitude Mountainous Environmental Training (HAMET) at Pōhakuloa Training Area (PTA), Island of Hawai‘i. The purpose of the proposed action is to provide helicopter aviators/crews high-altitude training flight operations, while recognizing Army stewardship responsibilities within the affected region. The need for the proposed action is to provide realistic training to ready helicopter aviators/crews to be successful in the combat theater to support the operational and mission requirements of the 25th CAB, 25th Infantry Division, set forth by the Department of Army and Department of Defense (DoD) for deployment in support of combat operations in Afghanistan and future related theater actions. Activities for helicopter aviator/crew proficiency training include but are not limited to: Touch and go, limited landings, approach and departure, reconnaissance, abort and go around, and nighttime operations in designated areas. Based on the information analyzed, the EA concludes that the proposed action would not result in any significant direct, indirect, or cumulative adverse impacts on the natural or human environment. The EA and draft FNSI are available for public review at the following public libraries: Hilo Public Library, Kailua-Kona Public Library, and Thelma Parker Memorial Public and School Library. Copies can also be obtained by contacting NEPA Program Manager at (808) 656-3075 or William.Rogers5@us.army.mil. Written comments will be received and considered up to 30 days from the publication of this notice, and should be directed to the email address above, or mailed to: Directorate of Public Works, Environmental Division (IMPC-HI-PWE), Attn: Mr. William Rogers, 947 Wright Avenue, Wheeler Army Airfield, Schofield Barracks, 96857-5013.

Thirty Meter Telescope Final EIS released

Eyes of the he’e…More desecration planned for sacred summit of Mauna Kea.  The proposed Thirty Meter Telescope would be the largest telescope in the world.  But Native Hawaiian and environmental groups will continue to fight the destructive project.   While this project is not a direct military project, most of the astronomy and space research programs in Hawai’i have ties to military funding or military applications.   In addition to the Thirty Meter Telescope, the Air Force is planning the PanSTARRS optical tracking telescope for Mauna Kea.

>><<

http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20100508/BREAKING01/100508010/EIS+released+for++1B+Big+Isle+telescope+project

Updated at 10:50 a.m., Saturday, May 8, 2010

EIS released for $1B Big Isle telescope project

By Erin Miller

West Hawaii Today

Gov. Linda Lingle accepted the University of Hawaii at Hilo’s final environmental impact statement for the proposed Thirty Meter Telescope project.

The document was released Friday, noting a few remaining issues as the university moves toward signing a sublease with TMT officials for the $1 billion project. The university and state officials still need to determine how scientists and staff will access the site and complete a sublease between TMT officials and the university. Construction is expected to begin next year and take seven years to complete.

“There are two broad opinions concerning the project’s potential impact on cultural practices and beliefs,” the report said. “(One) that Hawaiian culture and astronomy can coexist on Mauna Kea and impacts can be -mitigated and (two) any development on Mauna Kea would result in a significant adverse impact that could not be mitigated.”

Other potential impacts, listed as less than significant, include displacement of “nonsensitive lava flow habitat and not unique geologic resources,” visual impacts because of the observatory, use of energy to power the project, increase in trips to the summit area and temporary effects during construction.

Benefits, the statement said, include employment opportunities, direct contributions to the economy and astronomical pursuits. The observatory will have the telescope, an adaptive optics system and instruments in a dome, a support building and a parking area on a 5-acre site. The dome housing the telescope will be a calotte-type enclosure 180 feet high, will appear rounded and smooth and will have an aluminum-like exterior coating, the report said. An attached support building will be about 18,000 square feet. A visitor viewing platform and visitor rest room are included in the design.

Mitigation efforts are to include a design intended to limit visual and other impacts, a zero-discharge wastewater system at the observatory, cultural and natural resources training programs, an invasive species prevention and control program and other waste minimization and management programs.

Those efforts may not overcome some objections to the project; the final environmental impact statement acknowledged officials do not know how much impact ongoing work on Mauna Kea may have.

“From a cumulative perspective, the impact on cultural resources has been and would continue to be substantial, adverse and significant,” the statement said. “The cumulative impact to geological resources in the Astronomy Precinct has been substantial, adverse and significant.”

The observatory’s headquarters will be located on the UH-Hilo campus, in the University Park of Science and Technology development.

Hawaiians, mountain in ‘Avatar’-like struggle

http://www.sacbee.com/2010/03/09/2592650/hawaiians-mountain-in-avatar-like.html

My View: Hawaiians, mountain in ‘Avatar’-like struggle

By Tom Peek

Special to The Bee

Published: Tuesday, Mar. 9, 2010 – 12:00 am

If you’re one of the millions who sat riveted to James Cameron’s blockbuster movie Avatar, you probably sympathized with the indigenous Na’vi when American colonists bulldozed their magical rain forest to mine unobtanium, the prized mineral on Pandora, planet Polyphemus’ moon.

When the corporate/scientific/military confederation “negotiated” with Na’vi elders to quell growing unrest – bearing the usual “community benefits” trinket – you probably groaned. And when the invaders, unable to cajole the natives, bulldozed their Tree of Souls, where guiding ancestors’ voices could be heard, and bombed their giant Hometree dwelling, did your fists clench with rage?

Were you relieved – maybe you even cheered aloud – when the native defenders turned back the invaders before they could destroy their holiest Tree of Souls, connecting place to their deity, Eywa?

If you responded like many people did in the Hawaii theater where I saw Avatar, the answer is probably yes.

It doesn’t take a cultural anthropologist to recognize Avatar’s story line parallels in Hawaii, except that in the movie, ambitious (if sympathetic) biologists rather than Christian missionaries laid the groundwork for business and military interests, using genetically engineered human-Na’vi hybrids to infiltrate the culture. Unlike on Pandora, it took a century of bulldozing Hawaii’s revered places to finally reach native Hawaiians’ holiest spot – 14,000-foot Mauna Kea. Here, too, people connect with ancestors and deities.

Leaving the theater, I bumped into some Hawaiian friends waiting for the next show, a family with deep ancestral roots to Mauna Kea. This got me thinking about the campaign by the University of California and Caltech (allied with University of Hawaii astronomers and pro-business politicians) to bulldoze a pristine plain below the mountain’s already-developed summit cones to add another giant observatory to their science colony – the Thirty Meter Telescope, or TMT.

The California astronomers’ “unobtanium” quest – research papers revealing “the secrets of the universe” and identifying planets beyond our solar system – is certainly more noble than mining minerals, but it’s another example of promoting one culture’s notion of progress by overriding another’s reverence for the land. As in the movie, behind the Mauna Kea invaders stands the big money of a starry-eyed entrepreneur, Intel co-founder and telescope donor Gordon Moore.

For Hawaiians, Mauna Kea’s summit is where their genesis story took place; it’s the burial ground of their most revered ancestors. Hawaiians still conduct traditional spiritual and astronomical ceremonies there, despite the visual and noise intrusions of 20 telescopes crowding the summit. Biologists also revere the mountaintop, home to species found nowhere else on Earth, including plants and insects that rival those in Cameron’s film.

Decades of insensitive development have fueled public anguish over Mauna Kea’s industrialization, replete with weeping elders and young activists gritting their teeth in rising frustration. Two legislative audits lambasted state agencies for collusion with astronomy interests, and two courts ruled against the last UC/Caltech telescope project – the Keck Outriggers – for violating state and federal environmental and cultural laws, one ruling halting the project.

Seeking a peaceful solution to the increasingly polarized controversy, Hawaiians and local Sierra Club leaders met last year in private with TMT board chairman and UC Santa Barbara Chancellor Henry Yang, Caltech President Jean-Lou Chameau and a Moore representative, to implore the Californians to build the TMT at their second-choice site in Chile.

Ignoring all that, TMT officials decided in July to forge ahead with their Mauna Kea plans, pulling out all the stops to get what they desire. But this is America, not Pandora, so instead of enlisting military mercenaries, as in the movie, the Hawaii invaders hired an army of attorneys, lobbyists and planners to put a positive spin on their intrusive project and get around environmental and cultural laws governing the state conservation district where the telescope colony resides.

Hawaiians and environmentalists are again forced to defend in court the state and federal laws designed to protect places like Mauna Kea and native people like the Hawaiians – the same laws the last UC/Caltech project violated.

After spending tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars supporting California astronomers’ fight against the islanders, the University of Hawaii (desirous of sharing TMT’s prestige and precious telescope time), recently asked Hawaii’s legislature for $2.1 million to “ensure” the TMT bid. Local businessmen and politicians are being courted by astronomers – and pressured by powerful members of Hawaii’s congressional delegation – to back a huge project that will bring lucrative construction contracts to the summit.

Last month, the same Hawaii judge who in 2007 halted the previous UC/Caltech project dismissed islanders’ first legal challenge in the TMT battle – while observatory and construction workers picketed his courthouse with pro-TMT signs.

Whether that decision means Hawaii’s judges are now under intense pressure to support TMT is anyone’s guess. But if islanders are prevented from using the legal system to protect their sacred mountaintop, what choices remain for them?

Fortunately, no one is talking about following the Na’vi’s tactic of fierce resistance – aloha is too strong a tradition here.

Even so, peaceful civil disobedience could be just around the corner if islanders’ next day in court is like their last one.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Inouye’s legacy: locking the military into Hawai’i “for a long time”

The militarization of Hawai’i is driven by both the ‘push’ of military strategy in the Pacific and the ‘pull’ of politicians, unions and corporate leaders who profit from the military domination of Hawai’i.  The logic is spelled out here in a recent Hawaii Business article about Senator Inouye:
“The (White House) was not too keen about building a massive state-of-the-art Pacific Command building,” Inouye said. “But I made that one of my major goals.

“It demonstrates the importance of Hawaii as the command center of our security activities in the Asia-Pacific region.” Once the building was completed and staffed, Inouye chuckles, “it would be difficult for succeeding CINCPACs to give it up.” In short, the physical facility cements Hawaii’s importance to the military and virtually guarantees its presence here for a long time.

http://www.hawaiibusiness.com/Hawaii-Business/October-2009/The-Inouye-Legacy/

Hawaii Business / October 2009 / The Inouye Legacy

The Inouye Legacy

What he’s doing now to ensure Hawaii’s future

Jerry Burris
Dan Inouye, now 85, says he will run for another six-year
Senate term in 2010. Photo: Mark Arbeit

Sen. Daniel Ken Inouye has long been Hawaii’s most powerful and influential individual, a man who has brought billions of dollars into his home state and forged or supported industries in astronomy, high-technology, the military complex, research, agriculture and education.

Critics complain that Inouye is a master of earmarking budget items and pork- barrel spending, in effect wasting national resources on parochial issues. But Hawaii’s senior senator brushes off such criticism, even brags about his mastery of the earmarking process. He argues that every one of his projects can stand the litmus test – as important both for Hawaii and for the nation.

On a recent visit home, Inouye told an audience on the Big Island, “I’m the No. 1 earmarks guy in the U.S. Congress.” That remark produced a round of tongue-clicking and commentary from groups who seek to control government spending and stifle earmarks. Whether Inouye is No. 1 or not depends on how you measure things.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group focused on the influence of money on politics, Inouye ranks No. 5 in total Senate earmarks secured in fiscal 2009. His $450.5 million puts him behind Sens. Thad Cochran, Roger Wicker, Tom Harkin and Chuck Grassley. Hawaii’s junior senator, Daniel Akaka, was way down the list.

But those are total earmarks, including earmarks co-sponsored by more than one member of Congress. In solo earmarks, Inouye is indeed near the top at $220.7 million, far higher than any other member of the Senate save Robert Byrd, his predecessor as chair of the Appropriations Committee.

This is nothing new. From the moment of his first election to Congress right after Statehood in 1959, Inouye has been a one-man industry for his home. Inouye, who entered the Senate after the 1962 election, is currently the second most senior senator, after Byrd, and the third oldest, behind Byrd and Frank Lautenberg.

But Inouye downplays the suggestion that he alone is a key economic player for Hawaii and that the state will be in dire straits when he retires. “I hope that’s not the case,” he says soberly when presented with that proposition.

Yet other leaders, some of whom started their political careers in his Washington office, see Inouye in a dominant and crucial role.

“He is probably one of the state’s largest industries right now,” says Kirk Caldwell, managing director for the City and County of Honolulu. “He’s a growth industry at a time nothing else is growing.”

Walter Dods, former CEO of First Hawaiian Bank and a close confidante of Inouye’s for decades, calls him “our biggest secret weapon.”

“Over the past dozen years or so, he has really looked to help Hawaii once he ultimately leaves the Senate,” says Dods, who recently chaired a campaign that raised more than a million dollars for the senator’s war chest.

“His legacy has been that he has always been out there ahead, trying to fund projects that have a lasting impact.

“There’s a method to his madness,” Dods continues. “Without him, we would be in deep kim chee.”

When Inouye runs for his ninth senatorial term next year, he can point to the deep-draft harbor at Barbers Point, the Pacific Missile Range, the Maui supercomputer, Camp Smith and many other projects that have propelled one of the nation’s smallest states into an important post for the military and a national model for a sustainable energy future.

In his Honolulu office, Inouye is both assured and almost self-deprecating about his role in Hawaii’s economic future.

“I assure you my decisions are not haphazard,” he says. “They are part of a plan, if you can put it that way.”

“Many of my projects are not just for the next 10 to 20 years,” he says, but for the very long term.

When Inouye steps down, Dods says, “there will be a significant impact on Hawaii.” He mentions a recent meeting where the senator gathered people to discuss the next 50 years. The meeting was private and its results have not been published, but Dods says it is typical of Inouye’s long-range thinking.

“He doesn’t have the quarter-to-quarter mentality of most Americans,” Dods observes.

While he appears politically invincible, Inouye is keenly aware that his age could play a role in the coming campaign. He noted that he will turn 86 on Sept. 7, just days before next year’s primary election. “I can see my opponent buying up time on the TV stations just to say: ‘Happy Birthday, Dan! You made 86,’ ” he says with a laugh.

A test missile blasts off from Kauai’s Pacific Missile Range and is
later destroyed by an interceptor fired from a Navy ship. Below
is the headquarters of Pacific Command at Oahu’s Camp Smith.
Photos: U.S. Navy

While many of Inouye’s appropriations are focused on the military, it would be a mistake, he says, to see his efforts only through that lens. Still, there is no doubt that military spending is the foundation of the money (“pork” to his critics) he has secured for the Islands. And make no mistake: Those in the Armed Services here are more than grateful.

“Sen. Inouye has been a consistent, staunch supporter of initiatives to keep the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard active, serving the Pacific Fleet, and to support the Pacific Missile Range Facility at Barking Sands, whose invaluable presence sustained Kauai following Hurricane Iniki in 1992,” noted Rear Adm. Dixon Smith, commander of Navy Region Hawaii.

Although Inouye hasn’t always spoken about long-range goals, over 47 years in the Senate he has carefully and relentlessly built the infrastructure to solidly establish, for decades to come, two visions for his home state.

First, he has worked to establish Hawaii as a place of national importance – as indispensable as it can be. Without such attention, he points out, these small and remote islands could easily be overlooked. Or worse – ignored.

Take the new Pacific Command Center at Camp Smith overlooking Pearl Harbor. No question there was a need to replace the antiquated facilities housed in a former hospital. But the push to build the new Nimitz-MacArthur Pacific Command Center was about far more than simply keeping the military happy, Inouye says.

“The (White House) was not too keen about building a massive state-of-the-art Pacific Command building,” Inouye said. “But I made that one of my major goals.

“It demonstrates the importance of Hawaii as the command center of our security activities in the Asia-Pacific region.” Once the building was completed and staffed, Inouye chuckles, “it would be difficult for succeeding CINCPACs to give it up.” In short, the physical facility cements Hawaii’s importance to the military and virtually guarantees its presence here for a long time.

Similarly, Inouye says, he fought for construction of a bridge to connect Ford Island to the rest of Oahu. Opponents argued that it made little sense to build a bridge to an “empty island.”

“But it’s like that movie,” Inouye says, referring to “Field of Dreams,” a movie about a baseball field built in a remote Iowa cornfield. “You build a bridge and they will go across it.”

Today, Ford Island is thriving with new military housing, a complex of historical attractions and other facilities, serving as a central anchor for local Navy activities.

Secondly, he has purposely worked to link the Islands into a single strong economic and social unit. Hawaii’s future requires integrating the Neighbor Islands with once-dominant Oahu, he says, and that means putting money and time into projects that bring the scattered Islands together.

When he was growing up, Inouye says, the Neighbor Islands (then called by an even-more-remote term, the Outer Islands) were backwaters focused on agriculture. “Oahu was the Island,” he said. “The Outer Islands were islands of plantations and working people. I remember once a year on Christmas holidays the plantation managers and their wives would come to Honolulu for their annual spree and Christmas shopping.

“I wanted to carry on activities that would bring all the Islands together.”

Inouye notes that fiber-optic links are one major way of uniting the Islands. In addition, the Maui supercomputer; the star-gazing facilities atop Haleakala and Mauna Kea; the Pacific Missile Range on Kauai (“I had to fight like hell for that and now it’s a national treasure”) and other projects were all designed with the idea of making the Neighbor Islands an important piece of Hawaii’s overall economy, he says.

So, too, are the educational facilities, particularly the community colleges, which are thriving and growing on Maui, Kauai and the Big Island. UH-Hilo is already a full-fledged four-year university. “Before I go, I want all the community colleges built up to be worthy of being called universities,” Inouye says.

The Imiloa Astronomy Center outside Hilo was created
mostly with federal money secured by Inouye.
Photos: Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawaii and Macario

While much attention has been focused on the observatories atop Mauna Kea on the Big Island, Inouye’s reach goes deeper. Just outside Hilo, the gleaming new Imiloa Astronomy Center (built primarily with funds obtained by Inouye) is entertaining and educating visitors and local residents alike on the importance of astronomy. Just down the street are brand-new tropical agricultural research facilities working on high-tech solutions for Hawaii and the nation’s food security – again, built mostly with federal money.

“We’re now on our road and soon we’ll have the nation’s No. 1 telescope,” he says, referring to the Thirty Meter Telescope planned for Mauna Kea.

“We’ve got,” Inouye continues, “the foundation for Maui, Kauai and the Big Island. … Hawaii becomes one state. The Neighbor Islands become an important, integral part of the overall equation. They’re no longer the ‘Neighbor’ Islands.”

“It’s not finished yet, but it’s a long-term plan.”

Caldwell speaks admiringly of this second initiative. “He’s trying to create opportunities for the Neighbor Islands,” says Caldwell, who worked for Inouye in Washington from 1978 to 1981.

In addition to the capital projects, Inouye has focused on bringing better healthcare to the Neighbor Islands’ rural population, notes Caldwell.

An Inouye theme, Caldwell says, is a deep concern for the underdog, those groups who may not receive the attention or services they deserve. Over the years, he has championed Native Americans, Native Hawaiians, people with disabilities, the nation of Israel and others.

“The Native Hawaiian community, he’s trying to figure out ways to empower them,” says Caldwell.

“Something puts him there to drive him. It pushes him toward people who need help. He stood up for the Vietnamese boat people when Japan would not accept them. He flies at the highest level but he hasn’t forgotten his roots.”

Inouye has his eye on a new effort that links the Islands and, at the same time, supports both the civilian economy and the military: A “multi-multibillion-dollar” deep-water energy cable that would link Oahu with energy-producing operations on Maui, Lanai and Molokai and, someday, the Big Island.

“To provide the energy necessary for all the Islands, we need an underwater cable,” he said. A previous cable effort flopped. That’s not going to happen this time, Inouye suggests, because there is buy-in from the state, the counties, Hawaiian Electric Co. and the military.

Beyond the physical infrastructure, Inouye has also focused on the social and intellectual infrastructure of his home. He is a staunch defender of the East West Center, which is key to Hawaii’s reputation as a meeting ground between the West and Asia. He has pumped millions into the University of Hawaii with the goal of making it a major research institution, able to attract top scholars and capable of winning national grants. And he has been a core supporter of programs such as Alu Like, aimed at bettering the lives of Native Hawaiians. That focus, in part, is to fulfill a promise Inouye says he made to his mother when he was first elected to Congress. Kame Inouye, as a child, had been hanaied by a Hawaiian family and felt a lifelong obligation for that kindness.

“The Hawaiians have been good to me,” Inouye remembers his mother saying. “You (must) do the gratitude repayment.”

Inouye’s long-term projects and ideas have created political risk, although his powerful electoral victory margins over the years suggest the risk was more than manageable.

“If I went for some of the earmark programs some of my colleagues go for, I would have done my state a disservice,” Inouye says. “So I took a risk.”

Still, the day will come when Inouye is no longer a force for Hawaii. When he does leave the Senate, Inouye has advice for his successor:

“To the extent possible, I hope they would carry out the programs I felt would be helpful in establishing a healthy economy in Hawaii,” he says. “Hawaii should be an important part of the national picture.”

Dan’s long-range plan

During his five decades in Congress, Daniel Inouye has long had a specific plan as he worked to secure Hawaii’s long-term economic stability and security. It’s a plan not always obvious in the daily controversies over federal spending, earmarks and pork barrel politics.

The twin pillars of Inouye’s bedrock plan are:

1. To integrate Hawaii’s Islands into one economic unit, bringing the often-ignored Neighbor Islands fully into the mix;

2. To make Hawaii as indispensable to the nation as possible.

Whether it is the Barbers Point Deep- Draft Harbor, the Maui supercomputer, the Saddle Road on the Big Island, the sprawling network of fiber-optic cables that serves both the military and civilians, or the new high-tech headquarters for the Pacific Command at Camp Smith, Inouye says, his projects always serve those two purposes.

Inouye’s name doesn’t go here

For all the capital projects Inouye has won for Hawaii, you won’t see his name on many of them. That’s deliberate, he says.

“If your colleagues know you want a project because you wanted to be recognized from here to eternity, they will use it against you.” Thus, there are few “Inouye” facilities in Hawaii.

But, Inouye says with a laugh, one of the few facilities with his name is a dining facility at Camp Smith called the “Inouye Mess.”

After he sought federal funding to upgrade the swine production industry on the Big Island, Inouye says, he was honored by having one of the animals named after him – “Danny Boy.” And one of four new tugboats at Pearl Harbor is named in his honor, but is not called The Inouye. Officially, it is called Kaimanahila, a traditional Inouye campaign song. Informally, it is called “two scoop rice,” after the senator’s standard order when he eats at Zippy’s.

Some of his biggest projects

Here is a sampling of the many Hawaii projects Inouye has pushed through Congress in the past several years.

Maui Supercomputer:

The Maui High Performance Computing Center was created in 1993 to support the Department of Defense and to stimulate technology development on Maui and throughout Hawaii. The MHPCC has received more than $60 million in support, providing access to parallel computing hardware, advanced software, high bandwidth communications and high-performance storage technologies to researchers.

Saddle Road on Big Island:

Hawaii annually receives about $130 million in federal highway formula funds to support the state and the four counties. On top of that, dollars have been specifically set aside for priority projects on all Islands. For example, the federal government has invested $200.4 million over the past 10 years in the construction of the Saddle Road to ensure the safety of public motorists and military users.

Pacific Missile Range improvements:

PMR features the military’s latest technology in protecting both Hawaii and the U.S. from ballistic missile attacks. More than $944 million has been invested in and around the range – the largest industrial and technology employer on Kauai.

Imiloa Astronomy Center:

Located at the foot of Mauna Kea in Hilo, Imiloa is a celebration of Hawaiian culture and Mauna Kea astronomy – combined to bring a vibrant educational experience to Hawaii’s youth and demonstrating that science and culture are not mutually exclusive. Thanks to nearly $15 million in federal funding, there have been more than 120,000 visitors since it opened in 2006.

Agricultural research on the Big Island:

The Pacific Basin Agriculture Research Center in Hilo provides research support for the transformation from plantation agriculture to a diversified agriculture in Hawaii and America’s Pacific territories. About $48 million in federal funds helped complete Phase I; plans and about $15 million in funding for Phase II construction are ongoing.

Camp Smith Headquarters:

Since 2000, nearly $90 million has been appropriated to build a state-of-the-art headquarters for the Pacific Command overlooking Pearl Harbor. The command has jurisdiction over a sweep of the Pacific and Asia reaching nearly to the Mid-East.

Groups sue state over Mauna Kea management plan

http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091002/BREAKING01/91002053/Groups+sue+state+over+Mauna+Kea+management+plan

Updated at 12:03 p.m., Friday, October 2, 2009

Groups sue state over Mauna Kea management plan

By Nancy Cook Lauer
West Hawaii Today

HILO – A consortium of groups opposed to the state’s management plan for Mauna Kea said it filed suit in 3rd Circuit Court yesterday, fighting for its right to protest a plan it says doesn’t protect the environment or Native Hawaiian cultural resources.

The state Board of Land and Natural Resources earlier this year denied the groups – including Mauna Kea Anaina Hou, the Royal Order of Kamehameha I, the Sierra Club, KAHEA: The Hawaiian Environmental Alliance, and Clarence Kukauakahi Ching – a contested case hearing on the grounds they didn’t have legal standing to fight the plan.

“The board’s decision undermines the basic right everyone in Hawaii has to stand up for their environment, their culture and their religion,” Kealoha Pisciotta, president of Mauna Kea Anaina Hou, said in a statement. “Despite extensive evidence on the record of our cultural, spiritual, environmental and recreational connections to Mauna Kea, the Board is now claiming we suddenly have no right to ensure it is protected from bulldozers.”

The Land Board had approved the 299-page plan with amendments that made the University of Hawaii Board of Regents responsible for implementation, subject to land board oversight. It also put in a number of safeguards, including the creation of four sub-plans to address public access, natural resources, cultural resources and the decommissioning of telescopes.

Opponents of the plan are particularly concerned about a new Thirty Meter Telescope group that recently chose Mauna Kea over Chile. The development process for the TMT is now moving forward, with a meeting earlier this week of TMT designers and local design and construction companies.

“Mauna Kea belongs to the people,” said Alii Ai Moku Paul Neves, of the Royal Order of Kamehameha I. “Hawaii law has long recognized the unique interests of Native Hawaiians and the public in protecting our natural and cultural resources. The board cannot approve any management plan without hearing all of the facts first, and that means holding this contested case hearing.”

The management plan was required by a 2007 ruling of the 3rd Circuit Court in favor of these groups, who have been working to protect the summit for more than 15 years. In that 2007 decision, the court held that a comprehensive management plan is required before any land-altering activity can be allowed in the conservation district at the summit of Mauna Kea.

The cost of implementing the plan has been estimated at about $1.5 million a year, and former UH President David McClain said he was “committed to providing what’s necessary for the implementation of the plan.”

“The reason why I voted for it,” Department of Natural Resources Chairwoman Laura Thielen had said of the plan, “is it sets in place management steps. And the conditions the board added require the university to move forward with some specific issues that the public raised during the testimony.”

Thielen yesterday referred West Hawaii Today to Conservation and Coastal Lands Administrator Sam Lemmo, who did not respond to a phone message at his office.

Such a hearing, if granted, could delay implementation of the plan for months or years.

Lingle still courting militarized Superferry and ‘science cities’ on Haleakala and Mauna Kea

At a talk on Maui, Governor Lingle said if she could she would bring back the Hawaii Superferry.   “Lingle said she’s been in recent contact with the ferries’ builder, Austal, which is considering military contracts for the high-speed vehicle transports.” Lingle also said she supports the development of “science cities” on Haleakala and Mauna Kea, both sites that are threatened by military space research.

>><<

Updated at 7:51 a.m., Saturday, September 5, 2009

Downturn offers opportunity, Lingle says

By CHRIS HAMILTON
The Maui News

WAILEA, Maui – Gov. Linda Lingle told the Maui Native Hawaiian Chamber of Commerce on Friday that the economic downturn provided Hawaii with a chance to focus on alternative energy sources rather than continuing to rely on fossil fuels.

Her administration has and will continue to pursue new business opportunities in order to diversify the state’s tourism-based economy, she said in a wide-ranging discussion.

Lingle was the keynote speaker at the Grand Wailea Resort Hotel & Spa during the chamber’s third annual “Business Fest.” The Republican governor who is nearing the start of her last year in office also addressed topics from the Superferry; to looming deficits in county budgets; to the message given by economist Leroy Laney on Maui on Thursday that the recession is probably over.

Lingle said she agreed with Laney, who is an adviser to First Hawaiian Bank and professor at Hawaii Pacific University, saying the economic recovery will take time.

“Of course, we want it to be a quick recovery,” Lingle said to a mostly receptive crowd of about 150 people who twice gave her standing ovations. “But we have opportunities with this gradual recovery. It gives us time to decide what we are for as well as what we are against.

“Shame on us” if Hawaii emerges in the same position it was in prior to the recession, she said.

During the course of the past two years of economic decline, Lingle said, her administration has been able to set new priorities for Hawaii’s economy and Maui’s. She identified those as energy security and education, including retraining laid-off workers for “the new economy.”

Hawaii exports $7 billion a year, mostly to foreign nations, by importing 97 percent of its energy from fossil fuels, Lingle noted. Her vision would convert the state to 70 percent clean energy sources, such as solar, wave, biofuels and wind power, in just one generation, she said.

She predicted that the Native Hawaiian Chamber of Commerce will only continue to gain influence in the coming years as developers and entrepreneurs seek the group’s advice and endorsements. For instance, she said a massive public-private wind farm planned for Molokai will need the blessing of Native Hawaiian groups in order to create infrastructure, such as an underwater power line between Molokai and Oahu.

Lingle also said she supports the proposed advanced technology solar telescope at Science City on Haleakala and a similar telescope project on the Big Island, both of which combine to cost more than $2 billion to build but have encountered opposition from some Native Hawaiians who view the gigantic telescopes as eyesores encroaching on extremely significant spiritual places.

However, the Maui telescope alone will create 100 construction jobs and dozens of permanent staff drawn from the local population – who will receive more than $40 million worth of education, Lingle said.

“If you’re not for a project like this, than what are you for?” Lingle said.

Otherwise, Maui will continue to be stuck relying on tourism, with the same ups and downs, she said.

A few audience members could be seen quietly rolling their eyes at the apparent lecture from Lingle.

As she delivered a message encouraging positivity, the governor also managed to take a few jabs at the policies of her political opponents in the Legislature and local government. She called the legislature’s effort to raise the hotel tax rate counterproductive when occupancy rates are their lowest on record.

And she was also critical of Maui’s “show me the water” ordinance, which requires new developments to provide their own water sources. She lumped it with the county’s work force housing legislation, which requires developers to build affordable housing to accompany their luxury home projects.

The combined result has been a lack of new real estate investment in Maui, she said.

Proponents have said the ordinances are necessary so working families can afford to live on Maui.

It could take Maui longer to recover than the other islands, the former Maui County mayor said, since decades ago it positioned itself successfully as a high-end, exclusive island.

“I still feel that that was the right decision,” she said.

Lingle called on audience members to speak out in favor of issues they support rather than engage in opposition politics and lopsided protests.

The governor also took a few moments to address her ongoing and undecided battle with the public employees’ unions. She said if they had accepted her offer for weekly furloughs months ago, the employees wouldn’t be facing layoffs, now said to be in the thousands.

“We could have rectified this situation long ago,” Lingle said.

With the most recent state budget forecasts, the state is facing a nearly $1 billion shortfall. Maui County did not have to cut its budget significantly for the 2010 fiscal year.

However, Lingle said that since county property value appraisals often lag as long as 18 months behind state tax revenue forecasts and collections, she predicted that Maui County will have serious deficits soon, likely in the next two fiscal years.

Shortly after the speech, Maui County Managing Director Sheri Morrison said she agreed with Lingle’s dire predictions.

“She right,” Morrison said. “We will have to face up to those facts.”

During Lingle’s question-and-answer period, she was asked what she thought of Hawaii Superferry’s prospects. The interisland ferry left the islands and went bankrupt months ago after a judge ruled that Lingle and the Legislature hadn’t properly followed environmental law in pursuing the more than $350 million investment here.

Luncheon emcee Ron Vaught asked Lingle about the status of Superferry.

She said, “If I could, I would” bring it back. The two completed ferries now sit at a shipyard in Maryland. Lingle said she’s been in recent contact with the ferries’ builder, Austal, which is considering military contracts for the high-speed vehicle transports.

In the meantime, the state will “carry on” and work to complete the required environmental impact statement. Superferry was good for business, and the majority of people wanted it, she said.

Lingle called the lack of political leadership in support of Superferry “pathetic,” and said there were severe consequences as a result. The Alakai ferry was good for businesses that quickly embraced it as an affordable and fast way to ship goods between Maui and the state’s population center, Honolulu, she said.

Superferry critics, many of whom are Maui Democrats, said Lingle tried an end-run around environmental law by allowing the ferry to operate between Maui and Oahu without a completed EIS. The island risked potential cultural, traffic and environmental impacts because of the ferry system, they’ve said.

Lingle concluded the hourlong talk with a question about her political ambitions after she leaves office at the end of 2010. Lingle said she is too preoccupied with Hawaii’s current problems and has no plans now to run for another office.

“I just have to stay focused on what I’m doing now,” Lingle said.

Source: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090905/BREAKING01/90905010/Downturn+offers+opportunity++Lingle+says

Mauna Kea selected for more desecration

Posted on: Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Mauna Kea selected for world’s largest telescope

Native Hawaiians, environmentalists object to use of area

By Mary Vorsino
Advertiser Staff Writer

Mauna Kea was chosen yesterday as the site for what will become the world’s largest telescope – a mega-feat of engineering that will cost $1.2 billion, create as many as 440 construction and other jobs and seal the Big Island summit’s standing as the premier spot on the planet to study the mysteries of space.
Advertisement
Quantcast

But opposition to the project from environmental and Native Hawaiian groups could still prove a formidable hurdle for making the telescope a reality. Marti Townsend, program director for Kahea: The Hawaiian Environmental Alliance, said opposition groups will go to court to stop the project if needed.

“This is a bad decision done in bad faith,” Townsend said.

The new telescope – known as the Thirty Meter Telescope – is set to be completed in 2018, following seven years of construction. Astronomers say the project is expected to spur big advances in their field and offer new insight into the universe and its celestial bodies, including whether any far-away planets are capable of sustaining life.

The TMT will be able to see 13 billion light years away, a distance so great and so far back in time that researchers predict they’ll be able to watch the first stars and galaxies in the universe forming.

“It will really provide the baby pictures of the universe,” said Charles Blue, a media relations specialist with the Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory Corp.

Mauna Kea’s 13,796-foot summit was picked as the site for the new telescope over Chile’s Cerro Armazones mountain after more than a year of study, providing some rare good news for Hawai’i construction industry officials in today’s dismal economy.

“This is definitely going to be a shot in the arm for our industry,” said Kyle Chock, executive director of Pacific Resource Partnership, a labor-management organization that represents the Hawaii Carpenters Union along with some 240 contractors. Chock said building the telescope will require 50 to 100 construction workers daily.

TMT Observatory has pledged to make sure many of those jobs go to Hawai’i residents.

Another 140 jobs will be created for operations over the life of the telescope.

“It’s a huge announcement,” Chock said.

In a news release yesterday, Gov. Linda Lingle said the decision to build the telescope in the Islands “marks an extraordinary step forward in the state’s continuing efforts to establish Hawai’i as a center for global innovation for the future.” She added, “Having the most advanced telescope in the world on the slopes of Mauna Kea will enhance Hawai’i’s high-technology sector, while providing our students with education and career opportunities” in science.
strong objection

The telescope has also been met with strong opposition from Native Hawaiian and environmental groups.

Mauna Kea is considered sacred to Native Hawaiians, while environmentalists have raised concerns about how the project will affect rare native plant and insect species atop the volcano. That opposition could affect work on the new telescope, especially if those against the project decide to head to court.

“The people are stuck. What are we going to do? Sue or lose our rights,” said Kealoha Pisciotta, president of Mauna Kea Anaina Hou, which participated in a 2007 legal challenge that helped derail plans for a $50 million addition to the W.M. Keck Observatory.

The new telescope is much bigger than that project. A draft environmental impact statement estimates that the site for the project will cover approximately 5 acres on the summit, with a 30-meter segmented mirror in a 180-foot dome housing, a 35,000-square-foot support building and a parking area. The TMT project also calls for a mid-level facility on Mauna Kea at 9,200 feet along with headquarters at the University of Hawai’i-Hilo.

Sandra Dawson, EIS manager for the project, said TMT officials have had multiple public meetings and sit-downs with residents to get their thoughts on the telescope. She has gotten about 300 comments to the draft EIS, which are being reviewed.

“What we’re hoping for is that people who have in the past been in opposition will work with us to try to make this as acceptable as possible,” she said. “We’re going to do everything we can” to work with people.
14 telescopes

The telescope will be the 14th on Mauna Kea. It will require a permit from the state Department of Land and Natural Resources, which TMT officials are hopeful won’t be delayed. Meanwhile, the University of Hawai’i is in negotiations with TMT over the project. UH manages the summit of Mauna Kea, and Dawson said the university will get observing time in the new telescope as part of a lease.

TMT officials expect to finalize the EIS on the project by the end of the year. They expect to kick off construction in 2011.

Virginia Hinshaw, UH-Manoa chancellor, said in a statement that the project is “tremendously exciting for Hawai’i and will bring benefits both to our astronomers and certainly to our citizens through workforce development and science education.”

She added the decision to choose the Islands as the site for the cutting-edge telescope highlights the role “of Hawai’i … (in) advances in our understanding of the universe.”

UH-Hilo Chancellor Rose Tseng said the new telescope “holds great potential.”

“I’m doing everything I can to create the conditions under which a project like TMT can succeed on Mauna Kea and benefit the community,” she said.

TMT will be built by the University of California, the California Institute of Technology and the Association of Canadian Universities for Research in Astronomy.

About $300 million has been pledged so far for the construction of the new telescope, said TMT’s media specialist Blue. About $50 million has been pledged for design and development.

He said despite the economic downturn, “we’re confident the remaining funding can be secured.”

The new telescope will allow astronomers the clearest picture of space ever.

With it, astronomers will be able to view objects nine times fainter than with existing telescopes.

“It’s going to keep Hawai’i at the center of the world of astronomy,” said Taft Armandroff, director of the W.M. Keck Observatory, which has twin telescopes atop Mauna Kea with 10-meter mirrors, currently the world’s largest. “It’s a real validation that Mauna Kea is one of the absolute best places in the world to do astronomy.”

Reach Mary Vorsino at mvorsino@honoluluadvertiser.com.

Source: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090722/NEWS01/907220344/Mauna+Kea+selected+for+world+s+largest+telescope

Hilo residents blast giant telescope plan

Scope faces critics in Hilo

by Peter Sur
Tribune-Herald Staff Writer

Published: Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:39 AM HST

More than 150 people heard impassioned speeches Wednesday night in Hilo on a proposal to bring the Thirty Meter Telescope to the Big Island.

Much of it was negative, in stark contrast to Tuesday night’s meeting in Waimea. While the first four speakers in Waimea spoke glowingly of bringing the advanced observatory to Hawaii, the first six speakers in Hilo all slammed the idea. But as the night wore on, more people spoke in favor of the project. The meeting was still ongoing as of press time, with 14 in favor of the telescope and 14 against.

READ MORE

Public gets snow job on proposed giant Mauna Kea telescope

Telescope receives a warm reception in Waimea

by Peter Sur
Tribune-Herald Staff Writer

Published: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:45 AM HST

Majority of speakers during meeting voices support for TMT

WAIMEA — A friendly crowd filled an elementary school cafeteria Tuesday night to speak in favor of locating the Thirty Meter Telescope in Hawaii.

The Waimea meeting was the first of six meetings being held around the Big Island, plus one on Oahu. If approved and completed on time, an observatory with a primary mirror 98 feet across could be up and operating on the north slope of Mauna Kea by 2018.

TMT board members will meet July 20-21 in California to decide whether to build the telescope on Mauna Kea or on Cerro Armazones, a remote mountain in Chile.

The mood in Waimea, home of the W.M. Keck Observatory headquarters, was not unanimous, but of the 16 people who spoke, nine favored the TMT. A smaller number was opposed to bringing the telescope and the rest were ambivalent.

Richard Ha, a farmer and member of the Hawaii Economic Development Board’s TMT Committee, spoke of his efforts to have TMT fund a $1 million community benefits package.

Judi Steinman, executive officer of the Hawaii Island Chamber of Commerce, told a crowd of about 50 people that the chamber “strongly supports the TMT coming to Hawaii Island.”

“Our members see the TMT as an important part of our island’s business community to ensure the strength of our economy,” Steinman said.

“We can have a balance between Hawaiian culture and science,” said Mark Lossing, who said he represented more than 500 unemployed construction workers. “I also support the TMT because it will provide Big Island jobs.”

Andrew Cooper argued the scientific benefits of the telescope while wearing a yellow button that said, “TMT YES!”

Keawe Vredenburg took a different tack, asking for the development of a “Mauna Kea Protocol Management Plan” to protect the mountain’s numerous cultural resources.

Clarence “Ku” Ching disagreed. He was one of the plaintiffs in the court case that led to the development of the Mauna Kea Comprehensive Management Plan [CMP], and remains a strong opponent of building the TMT in Hawaii.

“I believe that the draft EIS (environmental impact statement), which is the subject of tonight’s discussion, is tainted. It’s … full of misrepresentations, deceit and fraud.”

[ku: What I said was that the EIS was principledly based on the CMP (being challenged in a Contested Case Hearing and will probably be modified) and the Mauna Kea 2000 Plan (unapproved by BLNR) – and that if “they” do not remove all references to these 2 documents – they would be crossing the boundary of misrepresentation, deceit and fraud.]

Wiley Knight, a former technician for the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope, asked that the TMT be built where the aging NASA Infrared Telescope Facility stands, instead of a “pristine area.”

Before the meeting, TMT representatives provided a preview of their presentations for the news media and answered some of the objections that Kealoha Pisciotta, an opponent of the telescope, had publicly raised.

Pisciotta had said, among other things, that the acceptance of federal funds triggers the need for a federal EIS.

“The federal government, federal agencies, they make that decision. We don’t. And what triggers NEPA (National Environmental Protection Act) is a significant federal action,” said Michael Bolte, director of California’s Lick Observatory and member of the TMT Board of Directors.

Regarding the Mauna Kea Comprehensive Management Plan, “we are an independent process. The legal opinions are that right now we can go forward completely independent of anything that happens with the Comprehensive Management Plan.”

[ku: This is utter bullshit! Without an adequate CMP – I believe that we can get an injunction to stop any construction that they think they can begin to put up there. In our court appeal – Judge Hara “stopped” any future construction on the mountain “until” a CMP was in place. So we’ll see which way it goes. This sounds like the TMT throwing down the gauntlet – that I’m sure we’ll be willing to take on the challenge.]

Two people commented on the spelling “Maunakea” in the EIS, said Sandra Dawson, environmental impact statement manager for the TMT. She explained that the University of Hawaii, not TMT officials, chose to spell Mauna Kea as one word.

Jim Hayes spoke on behalf of Parsons Brinckerhoff, the consulting firm that produced the EIS.

Hayes explained how consultants focused on impacts to culture and historical resources, biology and aesthetics, because those areas were singled out in earlier meetings.

“There’s no historic properties within 200 feet of the project, and there’s no unique or prime geologic areas in the disturbance area,” Hayes said. “We found the project would have minimal impact in the cinder cone habitat area, which is the most sensitive area.”

The impacts of the 50 people working at the observatory daily would be mitigated by the mandatory “ride-sharing” for crews from Hale Pohaku, resulting in an estimated 12 vehicle trips per day.

Remaining issues to be resolved include the specific route for the access road, the level of decommissioning and whether the enclosure should be painted white, brown or with the preferred reflective finish.

Anneila Sargent, an astronomy professor at the California Institute of Technology, touted the myriad scientific benefits of the TMT, including an advanced adaptive optics system that would allow for images 10 times sharper than the Hubble Space Telescope.

TMT, she said, would allow a deeper, sharper view of the universe in the visible and infrared spectra than any observatory that exists today — back to the formation of the first stars 13.3 billion light-years away.

More important than being able to image distant stars, arguably, will be an advanced instrument called a spectroscope, which can analyze the chemical elements of distant stars and even determine whether they have planets.

“The potential for what we can find is just astonishing,” Sargent said.

The next meeting is today from 4 to 8 p.m. in the Hilo High School cafeteria.

E-mail Peter Sur at psur@hawaiitribune-herald.com.