Makua EIS rejected by Malama Makua

Hawaiian group says EIS on Makua is not complete

By Mary Adamski

POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Jun 06, 2009

The Army said it will decide by early July to what extent it will resume live-fire military training exercises in Makua Valley. The training plan was part of an environmental impact statement released yesterday.

But Malama Makua, the nonprofit organization whose lawsuit forced the Army to halt exercises in the 4,190-acre Leeward valley, said it will be back in court to stop the Army again from resuming training because the environmental assessment is flawed and incomplete.

“We don’t share the Army view that this is a final copy,” said Earthjustice attorney David Henkin, who represents Malama Makua. “They don’t provide the legally required information,” Henkin said.

He said one example of insufficient assessment came in a “shellfish study” portion released by the Army Corps of Engineers in January. Intended to determine whether marine life that is consumed by people would be contaminated by minerals from military weaponry, the study only looked at two of the four marine categories required, and examined areas affected by sewage outfall pollution and urban runoff. “We hired experts to look at their study,” Henkin said. “I wrote a letter that they ought to withdraw this document.”

The Army favors using the Makua Military Reservation up to 50 days over a 242-day training year for infantry squad- and platoon-level exercises using multiple weaponry including missiles, rockets and illumination munitions. That is the highest usage among five alternatives assessed in the EIS. It would also allow up to 200 convoy live-fire exercises. “This alternative would allow the Army to train its units with maximum realistic training using critical weapons systems,” according to the EIS report.

“It will be Army leadership in Hawaii, in conjunction with leadership in Washington, D.C., who make the decision about how Makua is going to be used, if used at all,” said Loren Doane, public affairs officer for U.S. Army Garrison, Hawaii.

Doane said the Army prepared a list of all cultural sites within the valley as required by the federal court.

Relocating targets away from known cultural features is one of the “mitigation measures” listed in the EIS. Other public concerns about the damage and disturbance to natural resources and cultural sites, which came out in public hearings after the draft EIS was released in September, show up as “mitigation measures” to protect native plants, prevent soil erosion, deter brush fires and even minimize Army convoy effects on traffic.

The federal court ordered the Army to prepare an environmental impact assessment after Makua Malama filed suit in 1998 claiming that military use was harming natural and cultural resources. The Army agreed to halt live-fire training but was allowed to resume after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. It was halted again in 2005 until the EIS was completed.

“It is important for people to remember that … in all that time, soldiers have been trained, they have performed their tasks while receiving training elsewhere,” Henkin said. “Training at Makua is not the only place the Army has said it can accomplish its mission. People of Hawaii need to ask why the Army is pursuing the most destructive course of action.”

Source: http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20090606_Hawaiian_group_says_EIS_on_Makua_is_not_complete.html

Makua Military training: “wasting lives, land, money, energy and resources”

Joan Conrow wrote on her blog about the Army’s recently released final EIS for live fire training in Makua valley:

Now if only the military would pack up and leave, too, instead of pressing ahead with its controversial, and contested, plans to conduct live fire training exercises among the endangered species and archeological sites of Makua Valley. And as The Advertiser reports, good old Sen. Dan – surprise! – is solidly on board, albeit shaky in his facts:

Inouye, a World War II combat veteran who lost his arm in battle, said the Army is a good neighbor and longtime member of the community.

Rep. Neil Abercrombie sees things a little differently:

“Makua as a training site was acquired in the wake of the Pearl Harbor attack in WW II and never intended to be permanent,” Abercrombie said. “Alternatives which match the training needs of a 21st-century Army are available.”

Sort of like how Kahoolawe, similarly acquired in WWII, was never intended to be a permanent bombing target. And some 50 years later, following intense public pressure, the Navy did finally beat it – leaving its devastation and unexploded ordnance behind.

What a waste. But then, that’s what the military is all about: wasting lives, land, money, energy and resources.

Right on!

Hawaiians not happy with Army training plans

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/06/ap_army_makua_training_report_060609/

Hawaiians not happy with Army training plans

By Audrey McAvoy – The Associated Press

Posted : Saturday Jun 6, 2009 12:42:12 EDT

HONOLULU – The Army wants to conduct about 50 company level live-fire training drills each year in Makua, a valley many Native Hawaiians consider sacred but that the Army views as vital to maintaining combat readiness.

It also wants to fire inert missiles and rockets, including those that carry a greater risk of igniting wildfire than other weapons.

The Army outlined its preferred training plan for Makua in a court-mandated environmental impact statement released Friday.

The proposal is designed to “enable the military in Hawaii to achieve and maintain readiness for immediate deployment,” the report said.

Maj. Gen. Raymond V. Mason, the commanding general of the 8th Theater Sustainment Command, is expected to pick a course of action based on the results in 30 days.

The environmental impact statement is the final version of a study prepared in response to a lawsuit filed by a Waianae Coast community group, Hui Malama O Makua, in 1998. The group demanded, and a judge agreed, that the Army must conduct an environmental impact statement if it wanted to continue using the valley for live-fire training.

The Army released an earlier version of the report in 2005. Friday’s report incorporates issues since raised by the public, including examining Pohakuloa Training Area on the Big Island as an alternate live-fire training site to Makua.

The risk of wildfire is a major concern in part because the valley is home to dozens of Native Hawaiian cultural sites and several dozen endangered plant species that could burn in a blaze.

Fire broke out in Makua during Marine training in 1998. In 2003, a planned burn of brush by the Army raged out of control, scorching more than half of the more than 7-square-mile valley and destroying endangered plants.

The study analyzes five options, including not holding any live-fire training. Three of the options include training at Makua with varying degrees of weapons use and restrictions. The final alternative has the Army using Pohakuloa for live-fire training.

The option the Army has identified as its preferred alternative is the one that allows for the greatest use of weapons. It calls for soldiers to use TOW missiles – inert, tube-launched wire guided missiles – at Makua. These projectiles, along with 2.75 rockets and munitions, carry a greater risk of wildfire compared to weapons used in other alternative scenarios, the report said.

That’s because the missile or rocket propellant may not be fully consumed before the weapon reaches the ground.

David Henkin, an Earthjustice lawyer representing the Waianae community group, criticized the study for expressing preference for an alternative that would “lead to the destruction of irreplaceable cultural sites” and the “killing of endangered species.”

He noted the Army could still conduct training using less harmful training routines.

“The Army appears to be leaning toward the most destructive of the options it considered,” Henkin said. “That’s unacceptable.”

He also charged the Army failed to carry out all the analysis required under their settlement agreement. Moreover, Henkin said he has questions about whether the study complies with demands of the National Environmental Policy Act.

The Army holds a lease from the state to use Makua until 2029.

Army wants to resume destructive training in Makua

HonoluluAdvertiser.com

June 6, 2009

Army may restart live-ammo use in Hawaii’s Makua Valley

EIS that clears way for ‘full-capacity’ training may face court challenge

By William Cole
Advertiser Military Writer

After eight years of efforts, numerous setbacks and court filings, and millions of dollars spent on studies and legal fees, the Army yesterday released a nearly 6,000-page environmental impact statement seeking a return to “full capacity” live-fire training in Makua Valley.

The study’s completion could mean a return to live fire in the 4,190-acre Wai’anae Coast valley in the not-too-distant future. Live fire hasn’t occurred there since the summer of 2004, when the Army was supposed to have completed the environmental study.

A final record of decision is expected after 30 days. The Army could schedule training after that.

The Army’s “preferred alternative” out of five examined would include 50 combat-arms live-five exercises per year; 200 convoy live-fire exercises a year; the use of Humvees, trucks, Stryker armored and unmanned aerial vehicles and helicopters; the use of tube-launched TOW missiles and rockets; and use of a ridge between the north and south training areas.

The Army agreed under a 2001 court settlement with environmental law firm Earthjustice and the community group Malama Makua to conduct an Environmental Impact Statement analysis of the more than 75 years of military training in Makua Valley.

The EIS was supposed to be completed by October 2004, but one of many delays in its completion was a fire that was intentionally set by the Army in 2003 to manage grasses but which got out of control and charred half the valley.

Because the Army did not complete the EIS by the agreed-upon time, the military has been prevented in court from a return to live-fire training in Makua, although some blank-fire and vehicle training has been conducted there.

‘Problems’ with EIS

Earthjustice attorney David Henkin, who has represented Malama Makua for the duration of the case, yesterday said deficiencies in the study remain.

“We have some serious problems here – the first problem has to do with violating the court order in terms of what the required contents of this EIS are,” Henkin said.

Henkin said the impact of training on the marine environment has not been adequately addressed. He added that on Thursday, he sent the Army notice that if it does not withdraw the EIS and include the required information, “we’ll see them back in court.”

An Army environmental report released in January found little difference in ocean contaminants near Makua compared to “background” test sites at Nanakuli and Sandy Beach.

The court saga over the use of Makua Valley for training has generated conflicting views even among Hawai’i’s congressional delegation.

Hawai’i’s senior U.S. senator, Democrat Daniel K. Inouye, weighed in with an opinion piece running in tomorrow’s Advertiser.

“I encourage the people of Hawai’i to review all the information. In doing so, I hope you will come to the same conclusion: Let them train,” Inouye said.

Inouye, a World War II combat veteran who lost his arm in battle, said the Army is a good neighbor and longtime member of the community.

“It has taken its responsibility very seriously, and has come to the conclusion that it can sufficiently mitigate the risks inherent in conducting live-fire training exercises in the valley,” Inouye said. “Rather than continuing to nitpick at one thing or another, and force a return yet again to court, serving only to delay critical training that could provide the difference between life and death, I respectfully suggest that we, as a community, stand up and say, ‘We’ve had enough of these delay tactics. Let them train.’ ”

sacred sites

In 2007, the Army in a report to Congress called a return to company-size live-fire training at Makua Valley “absolutely critical,” a stand that drew a sharp rebuke from U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawai’i.

Abercrombie said the Army has spent millions to unsuccessfully defend in court the use of a training range that can be replaced.

The Army said at the time that the only theoretically possible alternative would be to spend up to $600 million to build up similar training capabilities at the 133,000-acre Pohakuloa Training Area on the Big Island, an effort it said would take seven to 12 years.

Abercrombie called the cost estimate ridiculously high.

“I am deeply concerned about the Army’s final Environmental Impact Statement regarding the continued use of the Makua Military Reservation,” Abercrombie said yesterday.

The land contains Native Hawaiian sacred sites, as well as endangered plants and species, he said.

“Makua as a training site was acquired in the wake of the Pearl Harbor attack in WW II and never intended to be permanent,” Abercrombie said. “Alternatives which match the training needs of a 21st-century Army are available.”

Return of the Makua land would be an “expression of good will and faith by the Army,” he said. “Its constrained use is not a matter of military necessity, but of legal convenience.”

No Decision yet

The Army yesterday said its EIS incorporates detailed studies, as well as more than 180 public comments received during numerous public meetings.

“No decision has been made regarding what type of training will be conducted at … (Makua) in the future,” said Col. Matthew T. Margotta, the commander of U.S. Army Garrison Hawai’i. “A decision will be made by senior Army leadership in Hawai’i in coordination with Department of the Army no less than 30 days from release of (the) EIS.”

The Army completed a company combined-arms assault course at Makua Military Reservation in 1988 and used it for 10 years, but suspended training temporarily in 1998 because of several fires.

The EIS defines some training as “core mission essential,” such as the company-size exercises that used to be held at Makua, but said that sort of operation is not occurring in Iraq or Afghanistan.

Makua training exposes a company of about 150 soldiers to multiple aspects of battle, including small-arms fire, artillery whistling overhead and helicopters swooping by firing machine guns.

Alternatives

The warfare in Iraq and Afghanistan requires “directed mission essential” training such as convoy live fire, but the Army said it needs to conduct both types of training at Makua.

Without the use of Makua, Schofield soldiers have traveled more to Pohakuloa on the Big Island and to the Mainland for training, keeping them away from their families longer and incurring a greater expense for the government.

The Army examined five options, including no action. The others are: reduced capacity at Makua with some weapons restrictions; full-capacity use of Makua with some weapons restrictions; the preferred alternative; and full-capacity use of Pohakuloa.

Fires from training in Makua Valley, with more than 50 endangered plant and animal species in the area, and more than 100 archeological features there, have always been a big concern.

Henkin, the Earthjustice attorney, said the proposed training represents a potentially significant increase in military usage of the valley.

“As people start processing this information, it’s important to bear in mind that all of the alternatives explored in the EIS provide for soldiers to be trained,” Henkin said.

Wai’anae Coast resident William Aila Jr. said he is disappointed the Army chose to take “the most destructive option” for training in Makua.

“They don’t need Makua,” Aila said. “What it is, is they don’t want to give up another inch of land in Hawai’i,”

Source: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090606/NEWS08/906060334/Army+may+restart+live-ammo+use+in+Hawaii+s+Makua+Valley

Makua final EIS released

Updated at 2:08 p.m., Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Army finalizes EIS for Makua training

Advertiser Staff

The Army has completed the final environmental impact statement for military training activities at Makua Military Reservation on Oahu, looking at the possibility of resuming live-fire military training exercises at Makua for Army, Marine Corps and Hawaii Army National Guard units.

The final EIS analyzed four alternatives to accomplish the proposed training, as well as a no-action alternative, under which no live-fire training would be conducted. The Army’s preferred alternative involves full-capacity use with fewer weapons restrictions. The Army says many of the munitions used would be consistent with the Endangered Species Act biological opinion established for training at Makua.

Live-fire training ended in 2004 pending completion of the EIS. The military says live-fire exercises are critical to maintaining military readiness and preparing soldiers for combat.

Some of the major potential impacts discusses in the final EIS are associated with soil, surface water and groundwater quality, air quality, cultural sites, natural resources, endangered and threatened species, noise, recreational resources, wildfires and the safety and transport of munitions through the Waianae community. The Army has recommended several mitigation measures that would reduce the overall impacts associated with the training.

The EIS is expected to be published Friday in the Federal Register and may be available to the general public at that time.

Copies of the final EIS are expected to be available at http://www.garrison.hawaii.army.mil/makuaeis/ as well as at the U.S. Army Garrison Hawaii Public Affairs Office and select public libraries.

Source: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090603/BREAKING01/90603044/Army+finalizes+EIS+for+Makua+training

Army seeks comment on Makua cultural site preservation list

Updated at 12:56 p.m., Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Army seeks comment on Makua cultural site preservation list

Advertiser Staff

The Army today announced the release of its recommended high priority cultural site list for unexploded ordnance clearance at Makua Military Reservation.

The list was drafted in response to public comments received during a 30-day period from Feb. 26 through March 28, which included a community meeting March 9.

A second public meeting to take additional comments will be announced later.

Copies of the list are available at the Hawaii State Library, 478 South King Street, Honolulu; Waianae Public Library, 85-625 Farrington Highway, Waianae; and the Kapolei Public Library, 1020 Manawai Street, Kapolei.

The site list can also be accessed online for reading or download at:

www.garrison.hawaii.army.mil/sitelistmmr/

Issuance of this list starts a 30-day comment period in which the public is invited to provide written responses.

Public comments may be submitted on or before May 28, 2009, by e-mail to peter.yuh@us.army.mil, and by fax to (808) 656-1039.

The public may also submit comments via mail to: U.S. Army Garrison-Hawaii, Directorate of Public Works Environmental Division, Attn: Cultural Site List Comments, 947 Wright Avenue, Wheeler Army Airfield, Schofield Barracks, HI 96857-5013

For further information, please contact the Environmental Division, at 656-6821.

Source: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090428/BREAKING01/90428085

Abercrombie speaks about Makua and Hawai’i Superferry

Neil Abercrombie, 20-year Congressional Representative from Hawai’i, is making a run for Governor in 2010.  He started out his political career as an anti-war activist at UH in the 1960s.   More recently, he has been a proponent of militarization of Hawai’i, including supporting the largest military land-grab since World War II, the Army Stryker Brigade.  But in recent years, he  has also come out criticizing the Army activities in Makua valley.   To illustrate his contradictory stance, here’s a excerpt from a Honolulu Star Bulletin Article about his views on the Hawai’i Superferry and the military in Hawai’i:

Hawaii Superferry: The service both to the military and local residents was valuable, he says, but the process of approving the environmental impact statement was mishandled. “This was a judgment disaster and a policy disaster.”

Military: Urge the military to leave Makua Valley. “The one time they were able to do some training, they managed to set it on fire.”

It shows a couple of things. First, that the steady efforts to win the clean up and return of Makua has built enough support to force him to recognize this issue.    And second, that there is a calculation that giving up Makua would win enough support from Kanaka Maoli, environmentalists, and peace and demilitarization activists to neutralize his stance on other military expansion efforts.

Here’s the full article:

http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20090414_Abercrombie_anxious_for_campaign_to_begin.html

Abercrombie anxious for campaign to begin

By Richard Borreca

POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Apr 14, 2009

With the impatience of someone who at 70 has finally decided what he wants to do in life, Neil Abercrombie sits in his Kakaako campaign office anxious to get on with what he considers the most important campaign of his political life.

U.S. Rep. Abercrombie is leaving a 20-year career in Washington politics at the time when his Democratic Party controls Congress and when he is close enough to President Barack Obama to have been in the tight crowd along with Oprah Winfrey to celebrate the inauguration upstairs at the White House.

The battle is for governor of Hawaii, a goal more than 18 months away but one Abercrombie is already fighting.

“There is no sense fooling around. If anyone else wants to run for governor, say so. Let’s get going and do it. This is not about options or finessing it,” said Abercrombie, who was the first to declare in a Democratic primary that could also attract Mayor Mufi Hannemann and Senate President Colleen Hanabusa.

For Abercrombie, who came to Hawaii in 1959 as a graduate student and first ran for office in 1970, the governor’s race is to be his last quest.

“I have a renewed sense of energy and joy. This is my 50th anniversary of coming to Hawaii. It is as if this incredible gift has been given to me.

“Everything I have learned about Hawaii makes me who I am today, and I want to bring a culmination in this run and I feel joyous about it.

“I will be able to say I gave every bit of energy and all of my sense of aloha to this campaign, and I will be content,” Abercrombie said last week in an interview with the Star-Bulletin.

Abercrombie went from being a left-wing campus orator and graduate student to serving in the state House and Senate and the Honolulu City Council before winning an office in Congress.

“He has name recognition and a well-tested political operation,” said Neal Milner, University of Hawaii political scientist and ombudsman. “He is formidable.”

Hannemann would be Abercrombie’s strongest rival, said Milner, because the Honolulu mayor also brings a skillful campaign style and the ability to raise campaign cash to the race.

“With Abercrombie,” Milner said, “you have someone who is already tested. It is not like you are suddenly going to find out something about him.”

Abercrombie said all those years in Congress, the Legislature and City Hall have both shaped and changed him. The garrulous Democrat said he has learned, for instance, when to stop talking and listen.

“I understand that it can be construed as lecturing other people, putting yourself in a position where you are telling them what they need to do. That is the wrong way to go about it,” he said. “People vote with you and for you for their own reasons, not yours. You are not the source of your own power, and taking that into account in yourself is something you have to do every day.”

So far Abercrombie has found some valuable friends, picking up old-time Democratic Party war horses like Charles Toguchi, the former state schools superintendent and legislator, and Ed Hasegawa, who worked on the Hawaii Obama campaign. Also, Abercrombie enlisted Andrew Aoki, 40, an attorney and co-founder of 3Point, a public-interest consulting firm, and Kanu Hawaii, a group that promotes the culture of aloha.

In contrast to Abercrombie’s extensive elective track record, Aoki is new to politics.

“I understand the paradox … but it may be that Neil’s time has come. There is an alignment between his principles and the action that this time needs,” Aoki said.

“He is a learner and he is open. His mind is filled with tons of experience, but he is willing to listen to those who feel they are out of the loop.”

This week, Abercrombie is wrapping up a two-week Easter recess trip back to Hawaii. He had campaign meetings on Kauai and in Kalihi and Hawaii Kai last week which supporters said each drew crowds of more than 100. He also plans a fundraising event while in the islands.

Abercrombie said he will continue to work in Washington and commute to his home state when he can. If he resigned, it would trigger a special election because House members cannot be appointed, like senators, and Abercrombie said he did not want the state to go through the expense of holding a special election.
Abercrombie on the issues

As he starts his run for governor, U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie is detailing some of his campaign issues.

Housing: Establish a public-private partnership to build and maintain new affordable housing. Demolish Aloha Stadium to allow development of the property and require private developers build a new stadium. “You build us a new stadium so we can really compete in Division I.”

Environment: Move Hawaii toward energy independence using domestically produced fuel and toward growing its own food. “These are self-defense measures, and you have to be completely devoted to them.”

Hawaii Superferry: The service both to the military and local residents was valuable, he says, but the process of approving the environmental impact statement was mishandled. “This was a judgment disaster and a policy disaster.”

Military: Urge the military to leave Makua Valley. “The one time they were able to do some training, they managed to set it on fire.”

With the impatience of someone who at 70 has finally decided what he wants to do in life, Neil Abercrombie sits in his Kakaako campaign office anxious to get on with what he considers the most important campaign of his political life.

U.S. Rep. Abercrombie is leaving a 20-year career in Washington politics at the time when his Democratic Party controls Congress and when he is close enough to President Barack Obama to have been in the tight crowd along with Oprah Winfrey to celebrate the inauguration upstairs at the White House.

The battle is for governor of Hawaii, a goal more than 18 months away but one Abercrombie is already fighting.

“There is no sense fooling around. If anyone else wants to run for governor, say so. Let’s get going and do it. This is not about options or finessing it,” said Abercrombie, who was the first to declare in a Democratic primary that could also attract Mayor Mufi Hannemann and Senate President Colleen Hanabusa.

For Abercrombie, who came to Hawaii in 1959 as a graduate student and first ran for office in 1970, the governor’s race is to be his last quest.

“I have a renewed sense of energy and joy. This is my 50th anniversary of coming to Hawaii. It is as if this incredible gift has been given to me.

“Everything I have learned about Hawaii makes me who I am today, and I want to bring a culmination in this run and I feel joyous about it.

“I will be able to say I gave every bit of energy and all of my sense of aloha to this campaign, and I will be content,” Abercrombie said last week in an interview with the Star-Bulletin.

Abercrombie went from being a left-wing campus orator and graduate student to serving in the state House and Senate and the Honolulu City Council before winning an office in Congress.

“He has name recognition and a well-tested political operation,” said Neal Milner, University of Hawaii political scientist and ombudsman. “He is formidable.”

Hannemann would be Abercrombie’s strongest rival, said Milner, because the Honolulu mayor also brings a skillful campaign style and the ability to raise campaign cash to the race.

“With Abercrombie,” Milner said, “you have someone who is already tested. It is not like you are suddenly going to find out something about him.”

Abercrombie said all those years in Congress, the Legislature and City Hall have both shaped and changed him. The garrulous Democrat said he has learned, for instance, when to stop talking and listen.

“I understand that it can be construed as lecturing other people, putting yourself in a position where you are telling them what they need to do. That is the wrong way to go about it,” he said. “People vote with you and for you for their own reasons, not yours. You are not the source of your own power, and taking that into account in yourself is something you have to do every day.”

So far Abercrombie has found some valuable friends, picking up old-time Democratic Party war horses like Charles Toguchi, the former state schools superintendent and legislator, and Ed Hasegawa, who worked on the Hawaii Obama campaign. Also, Abercrombie enlisted Andrew Aoki, 40, an attorney and co-founder of 3Point, a public-interest consulting firm, and Kanu Hawaii, a group that promotes the culture of aloha.

In contrast to Abercrombie’s extensive elective track record, Aoki is new to politics.

“I understand the paradox … but it may be that Neil’s time has come. There is an alignment between his principles and the action that this time needs,” Aoki said.

“He is a learner and he is open. His mind is filled with tons of experience, but he is willing to listen to those who feel they are out of the loop.”

This week, Abercrombie is wrapping up a two-week Easter recess trip back to Hawaii. He had campaign meetings on Kauai and in Kalihi and Hawaii Kai last week which supporters said each drew crowds of more than 100. He also plans a fundraising event while in the islands.

Abercrombie said he will continue to work in Washington and commute to his home state when he can. If he resigned, it would trigger a special election because House members cannot be appointed, like senators, and Abercrombie said he did not want the state to go through the expense of holding a special election.

Abercrombie on the issues

As he starts his run for governor, U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie is detailing some of his campaign issues.

Housing: Establish a public-private partnership to build and maintain new affordable housing. Demolish Aloha Stadium to allow development of the property and require private developers build a new stadium. “You build us a new stadium so we can really compete in Division I.”

Environment: Move Hawaii toward energy independence using domestically produced fuel and toward growing its own food. “These are self-defense measures, and you have to be completely devoted to them.”

Hawaii Superferry: The service both to the military and local residents was valuable, he says, but the process of approving the environmental impact statement was mishandled. “This was a judgment disaster and a policy disaster.”

Military: Urge the military to leave Makua Valley. “The one time they were able to do some training, they managed to set it on fire.”

Makua Sunrise 2009

The 13th Annual Makua Sunrise Ceremony

Sunday, April 12, 2009

6:00 am

Makua Valley, inside the military reservation

Interfaith sunrise ceremony to pray for the restoration of life and peace in Makua and the world.

The first Makua sunrise event was held on the beach of Makua on Easter 1997, when the Marines had planned an amphibious invasion training.   Canoes, surfers and others gathered on the beach in prayer and blocked the exercise. The Makua Sunrise ceremony moved into the valley the following year and has been held there ever since.

Participants are welcome to share a prayer, song, poem or thoughts. There is usually a potluck gathering at the beach after the event.

Sponsored by Malama Makua.  Contact Fred Dodge for more information:   makuakauka@hotmail.com

Army public meeting on Makua Cultural Sites access

IMPORTANT!

Makua Cultural Sites Meeting

Monday, March 9th, 6:30 P.M.

Nanaikapono Elementary School

89-153 Mano Avenue (Nanakuli ahupua’a)

The U.S Army is holding a community meeting in Wai’anae to prioritize cultural sites that the public wants access to. Malama Makua and Hui Malama Makua are in the process of creating a list of those sites and will be circulating that list at the meeting. We are asking you to kokua. Please attend and support the list of priority sites.

Mahalo a nui loa

Army must let Kanaka Maoli indentify priority clean up sites

Army Must Let Hawaiians Select Sites for Explosives Removal

HONOLULU, Hawaii, January 27, 2009 (ENS) – The U.S. Army must “provide meaningful opportunities” for the people of west Oahu to “participate in identifying and prioritizing” cultural sites to be cleared of explosives on a military reservation in a valley sacred to the Hawaiian people, a federal district court in Honolulu ruled Friday.

The court held that, in finalizing its list of high priority sites on April 22, 2008, over five and a half years after the deadline established in a legal settlement, the Army improperly relied on outdated information and excluded public participation at the Makua Military Reservation on the Wai’anae Coast of Oahu, 38 miles northwest of Honolulu.

The court affirmed the U.S. Army’s duties under a October 4, 2001 settlement with Malama Makua, a community organization represented in the case by the nonprofit law firm Earthjustice.

In its ruling, the court said if the Army were allowed to identify the high priority sites in 2008 based on information available in 2002, they would have gained years of noncompliance with the terms of the settlement at no cost to themselves “exacerbat[ing] their unjust enrichment.”

Accordingly, the court clarified its April 9, 2008 order holding that the Army violated its duty to identify high priority sites.

The Army was ordered to revise its priority list based on input from a minimum of two public comment periods and to focus on increasing access to high priority cultural sites.
Makua Valley on the west coast of Oahu (Photo courtesy U.S. Army)

“In negotiating the 2001 settlement, Malama Makua insisted that high priority sites be identified and cleared of unexploded ordnance because that’s the only way to bring cultural life back to Makua,” said Malama Makua president Sparky Rodrigues.

“By refusing to ask local practitioners to give their mana’o [input] about their highest priorities, the Army turned the process into a sham. We’re pleased the court understands that and has insisted that the Army give the people of the Wai’anae Coast meaningful opportunities to participate.”

Makua, which means “parents” in Hawaiian, is a sacred area, rich in cultural resources. More than 100 Native Hawaiian cultural sites have been identified within the military reservation, including Hawaiian temples known as heiau, altars, burials and petroglyphs.

The court order requires the Army to finalize the revised high priority list by June 12, 2009, and then to set forth a “‘good faith’ plan to clear [unexploded ordnance] from each of the [high priority] sites” in an October 15, 2009 report to the court.”

Thereafter, the Army must report to the court quarterly regarding its efforts to clear unexploded ordnance until all high priority sites have been cleared of unexploded ordnance, or until the court orders otherwise.

“We shouldn’t have to take the Army to court twice to get it to live up to its promise to move quickly to expand cultural access,” said Earthjustice attorney David Henkin. “We hope the clear commands in today’s order will finally ensure Native Hawaiian practitioners can reconnect with the valley’s sacred sites.”

Use of Makua Valley by the Army and other U.S. armed forces dates back to the 1920s.

The valley was used for combined-arms assault course training exercises by the 25th Infantry Division based at Scofield Barracks on Oahu from May 1988. In September 1998, the Army temporarily suspended training at Makua after several wildfires burned outside the firebreak roads.

In July 2001, the U.S. District Court barred the Army from continuing live-fire training.

Malama Makua is a nonprofit organization formed in 1992 to oppose the Army’s open burn and open detonation permit application to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In addition to the sacred sites, there are over 50 endangered plant and animal species in the region affected by the training exercises.

Malama Makua has continued to monitor military activities at Makua and has participated in a number of community initiatives to care for the valley’s land and resources.

Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2009. All rights reserved.

Source: http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jan2009/2009-01-27-092.asp